Borehole electrokinetics

Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK)

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 724-728

  Glover, Paul W J ^a   Jackson, Matthew D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREHOLES; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS; ELECTROLYTES; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ROCKS;

BOREHOLE MEASUREMENTS; BULK ELECTROLYTES; ELECTRICAL DOUBLE LAYERS; FLUID-FLOW PROPERTIES; PORE FLUID PRESSURE; POROELASTIC WAVES; SEISMIC PROPERTIES; SEISMOELECTRIC PHENOMENA;

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

BOREHOLE; DETECTION METHOD; ELECTRICAL PROPERTY; ELECTROKINESIS; ELECTROLYTE; FLUID PRESSURE; MINERAL; POROELASTICITY; ROCK PROPERTY;

EID: 77953557286     PISSN: 1070485X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3447786     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Schuch, M., 1989, Streaming potential in nature, in detection of subsurface flow phenomena:, Springer Verlag.
2. Saunders, J., M., Jackson, and C., Pain, 2008, Fluid flow monitoring in oil fields using downhole measurements of electrokinetic potential:, G EOPHYSICS, 73, no. 5, E165-E180.
3. Dupuis, J., K., Butler, A., Kepic, and B., Harris, 2009, Anatomy of a seismoelectric conversion: Measurements and conceptual modeling in boreholes penetrating a sandy aquifer:, Journal of Geophysical Research, doi:10.1029/2008JB005939.
4. Jaafar, M., J., Vinogradov, and M., Jackson, 2009, Measurement of streaming potential coupling coefficient in sandstones saturated with high salinity NaCl brine:, Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L21306, doi:10.1029/2009GL040549.
5. Beamish, D. and R., Peart, 1998, Electrokinetic geophysics-a review:, Terra Nova, 10, 48-55.
6. Thompson, A. and G., Gist, 1993, Geophysical applications of electrokinetic conversion:, The Leading Edge, 12, 1169-1173.
7. Haines, S., 2004, Seismoelectric imaging of shallow targets: Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
8. Worthington, M. and C., Hunt, 2000, Borehole electrokinetic responses in fracture dominated hydraulically conductive zones:, Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 1315-1318.
9. Dupuis, J., and K., Butler, 2006, Vertical seismoelectric profiling in a borehole penetrating glaciofluvial sediments:, Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L16301, doi:10.1029/2006GL026385.
10. Zhu, Z., and M. N., Toksoz, 2005, Seismoelectric and seismomagnetic measurements in fractured borehole models:, G EOPHYSICS, 70, no. 4, F45-F51.
11. Revil, A., P., Pezard, and P., Glover, 1999, Streaming potential in porous media. I. Theory of the zeta-potential:, Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, B9, 20021-20032.
12. Pride, S., 1994, Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media:, Physics Review B, 50, 15678-15696.
13. Glover, P., I., Zadjali, and K., Frew, 2006, Permeability prediction from MICP and NMR data using an electrokinetic approach:, G EOPHYSICS, 71, no. 4, F49-F60.
14. Glover, P., and E., Walker, 2009, Grain size to effective pore size transformation derived from electrokinetic theory:, G EOPHYSICS, 74, no. 1, E17-E29.