Sacrocolpopexy using xenogenic acellular collagen in patients at increased risk for graft-related complications

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 563-567

  Claerhout, Filip ^a   Ridder, Dirk De ^a   Beckevoort, Dirk Van ^a   Coremans, Georges ^a   Veldman, Joan ^a   Lewi, Paul ^a   Deprest, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complications; Pelvicol; Sacrocolpopexy; Surgisis; Xenografts

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ACCIDENT; ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BLADDER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DYSPAREUNIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT INFECTION; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INFECTION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVIEW; INTESTINE MUCOSA; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LAPAROSCOPY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PERFORATION; REOPERATION; SACROCOLPOPEXY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TISSUE INJURY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION; VAGINAL INJURY; VAGINAL ULCER; XENOGRAFT;

AGED; BIOPROSTHESIS; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA;

EID: 77953555986     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20805     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev 2007; Art. No.: CD004014. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3. (Pubitemid 351805663)
2. Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: Experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 2005;47: 230-236
3. Claerhout F, De Ridder D, Roovers JP, et al. Medium term anatomical and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy beyond the learning curve. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1459-1467
4. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:805-823
5. Visco AG, Weidner AC, Barber MD, et al. Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;84:297-302.
6. Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:688.e1-5
7. Jones JW, Jurkovich GJ. Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds. Am Surg 1989;55:73-76
8. Franklin ME, Jr., González JJ, Michaelson RP, et al. Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields. Hernia 2002;6:171-174
9. Patton JH, Jr., Berry S, Kralovich KA. Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 2007;193:360-363
10. Hurt WG. Abdominal sacral colpopexies complicated by vaginal graft extrusion. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1033-1034
11. Franklin ME, Jr., Treviño JM, Portillo G, et al. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: Long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1941-1946
12. Bump R, Mattiasson A, BØ K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-17
13. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21: 261-274
14. Safir M, GousseM, Rovner E, et al. 4-defect repair for grade 4 cystocoele. J Urol 1999;161:587-594
15. Badylak SF, Coffey AC, Lantz GC, et al. Comparison of the resistance to infection of intestinal submucosa arterial autografts versus polytetrafluoroethylene arterial prostheses in a dog model. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:465-472
16. Sarikaya A, Record R, Wu CC, et al. Antimicrobial activity associated with extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng 2002;8:63-71.
17. Zheng F, Xu L, Verbist L, et al. Cytokine production following experimental implantation of xenogenic dermal collagen and polypropylene grafts in mice. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:280-289
18. Quiroz LH, Gutman RE, Shippey S, et al. Sacrocolpopexy: Anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:557.e1-5
19. Altman D, Anzen B, Brismar S, et al. Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh. Urology 2006;67:719-724
20. Hilger WS, Walter A, Zobitz ME, et al. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit and abdominal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1826-1831
21. Walter AJ, Morse AN, Leslie KO, et al. Histolic evaluation of human cadaveric fascia in a rabbit vagina model. Int Urogynecol J 2006;17:136-142
22. Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, et al. Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 2005;140: 549-560
23. Ueno T, Pickett LC, de la Fuente SG, et al. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:109-112
24. Boukerrou M, Orazi G, Nayama M, et al. Promontofixation procedure: Use of non-absorbable sutures or Tackers? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003;32:524-528
25. Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, CanisM, et al. Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: A series of 138 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14:712-718
26. Deprest J, De Ridder D, Roovers JP, et al. Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts as compared to synthetic grafts. J Urol DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.043.