Reproducibility of same session repeated cystometry and pressure-flow studies in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 428-431

  Broekhuis, Suzan R ^a   Kluivers, Kirsten B ^a   Hendriks, Jan C M ^a   Massolt, Elske T ^b   Groen, Jan ^c   Vierhout, Mark E ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cystometry; Pressure flow study; Repeatability; Reproducibility; Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER FILLING; BLADDER PRESSURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CYSTOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MCNEMAR TEST; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; POSTVOID RESIDUAL URINE VOLUME; REPEAT PROCEDURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINE FLOW RATE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URINE VOLUME; URODYNAMICS; UROFLOWMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 77953547616     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20783     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21: 261-274
2. Mortensen S, Lose G, Thyssen H. Repeatability of cystometry and pressureflow parameters in female patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2002;13:72-75
3. Brostrom S, Jennum P, Lose G. Short-term reproducibility of cystometry and pressure-flow micturition studies in healthy women. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:457-460
4. Gupta A, Defreitas G, Lemack GE. The reproducibility of urodynamic findings in healthy female volunteers: Results of repeated studies in the same setting and after short-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23: 311-316
5. Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: Three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int 1999;84:14-15
6. Tan TL, Bergmann MA, Griffiths D, et al. Stop test or pressure-flow study? Measuring detrusor contractility in older females. Neurourol Urodyn 2004; 23:184-189
7. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998;7:301-317
8. Grynderup V. Double cystometry in the uninhibited neurogenic bladder. Acta Neurol Scand 1966;42:67-77.
9. Ockrim J, Laniado ME, Khoubehi B, et al. Variability of detrusor overactivity on repeated filling cystometry in men with urge symptoms: Comparison with spinal cord injury patients. BJU Int 2005. 95:587-590
10. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, et al. Overactive bladder symptoms: Do we need urodynamics? Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:105-108
11. Webb RJ, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD, et al. Measurement of voiding pressures on ambulatory monitoring: Comparison with conventional cystometry. Br J Urol 1990;65:152-154
12. Van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC. Ambulatory Urodynamics, Fromphysiological research to daily 1 practice. Thesis, 2 University of Maastricht, April 1993.
13. Gjorup T. Reliability of diagnostic tests. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1997;166:9-14.
14. Rahmanou P, Chaliha C, Kulinskaya E, et al. Reliability testing of urodynamics, pressure flow studies and cough leak point pressure in women with urodynamic stress incontinence with and without detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008. 19:933-938