Skiing, cheese fondue and Swiss watches: Analogical discourse in vocational training interactions

Vocations and Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 117-140

  Filliettaz, Laurent ^a   de Saint Georges, Ingrid ^a   Duc, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Analogies; Apprenticeship; Conceptual development; Identity; Language; Situated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953544631     PISSN: 1874785X     EISSN: 18747868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12186-010-9035-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
2. Billett, S. (2008). Emergent perspectives on workplace learning. In S. Billett, Ch Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 1-15). Rotterdam: Sense.
3. Billett, S. (2009). Modalités de participation sur la place de travail: la dualité constitutive de l'apprentissage par le travail. In M. Durand & L. Filliettaz (Eds.), Travail et formation des adultes (pp. 37-63). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
4. Balibar-Mrabati, A. & Corenna, M. (Ed.) (2002). Nouvelles approches de la métaphore. Langue française, 134.
5. Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., Duc, B. (2008). « Vos mains sont intelligentes! »: interactions en formation professionnelle initiale. Université de Genève: Cahiers de la Section des Sciences de l'éducation, 117.
6. Filliettaz, L. (2010). Guidance as an interactional accomplishment: practice-based learning within the Swiss VET system. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: models, traditions, orientations and approaches. London: Springer.
7. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). New York: Cambridge University.
8. Gonnon, Ph. (2005). Challenges in the Swiss vocational education and training system. bwp@, 7.
9. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
10. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
11. Kress, G., et al. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
13. Lee, Y.-A. (2004). The work of examples in classroom instruction. Linguistics and education, 15, 99-120.
14. LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse and technology. Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington: Georgetown University.
15. Nonnon, E. (1993). Prenons un exemple: recours aux cas particuliers et problèmes d'intercompréhension dans l'interaction didactique. In J.-F. Halté (Ed.), Interactions: actualité de la recherche et enjeux pédagogiques (pp. 201-245). Nancy-Metz: Presse Universitaire.
16. Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
17. Pugh, S. L., et al. (1997). Metaphorical ways of knowing: the imaginative nature of thought and expression. Urbana: National council of teachers of English.
18. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Sander, E. (2002). L'analogie, fondement de nos apprentissages. Recherche, 353, 40-43.
20. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
21. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University.
22. Wortham, S. (1996). Some interactional effects of teaching with example. Journal of classroom interaction, 31(2), 31-40.