The impact of hallux valgus on foot kinematics: A cross-sectional, comparative study

Gait and Posture

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 102-106

  Deschamps, Kevin ^a,b   Birch, Ivan ^c   Desloovere, Kaat ^a   Matricali, Giovanni A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Foot joints; Gait analysis; Hallux valgus; Kinematics; Multi segment foot model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GAIT; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; STANDING; VOLUNTEER; WEIGHT BEARING; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FOOT; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 77953542876     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Taranto J., Taranto M.J., Bryant A.R., Singer K.P. Analysis of dynamic angle of gait and radiographic features in subjects with hallux abducto valgus and hallux limitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2007, 97(3):175-188.
2. Jahss M.H. Disorders of the foot and ankle 1992, WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
3. Kernozek T.W., Elfessi A., Sterriker S. Clinical and biomechanical risk factors of patients diagnosed with hallux valgus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93(2):97-103.
4. Okuda R., Kinoshita M., Yasuda T., Jotoku T., Kitano N., Shima H. The shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head as a risk factor for recurrence of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:2163-2172.
5. Schoenhaus H.D., Cohen R.S. Etiology of the bunion. J Foot Ankle Surg 1992, 31:25.
6. Nawoczenski D.A., Epler M.E. Orthotics in functional rehabilitation of the lower limb 1997, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 116-155.
7. Tang S.F., Chen C.P., Pan J.L., Chen J.L., Chau-Peng L., Ngok-Kiu C. The effects of a new foot-toe orthosis in treating painful hallux valgus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83(12):1792-1795.
8. Hamilton R.J., Gray A., Kumar S. Surgical treatment of hallux valgus-the current practice in Scotland. The Foot 2005, 15(2):65-67.
9. Monga P., Kumar A., Simons A. Outcome following surgery for hallux valgus: the patients' perspective. Foot Ankle Surg 2006, 12(2):95-98.
10. Hutton W.C., Dhanendran M. The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet-a quantitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981, 157:7-13.
11. Blomgren M., Turan I. Gait analysis in hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg 1991, 30(1):70-71.
12. Waldecker U. Pedographic analysis of hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Surg 2004, 10(3):121-124.
13. Nyska M., Liberson A., McCabe C., Linge K., Klenerman L. Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Surg 1998, 4:35-41.
14. Saro C., Andrén B., Felländer-Tsai L., Lindgren U., Arndt A. Plantar pressure distribution and pain after distal osteotomy for hallux valgus: a prospective study of 22 patients with 12-month follow-up. The Foot 2007, 17(2):84-93.
15. Dhukaram V., Hullin M.G., Kumar C.S. The Mitchell and scarf osteotomies for hallux valgus correction: a retrospective, comparative analysis using plantar pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006, 45(6):400-409.
16. Baker R., Robb J. Foot models for clinical gait analysis. Gait Posture 2006, 23:399-400.
17. Carson M.C., Harrington M.E., Thompson N., O'Connor J.J., Theologis T.N. Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. J Biomech 2001, 34:1299-1307.
18. MacWilliams B.A., Cowley M., Nicholson D.E. Foot kinematics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture 2003, 17(3):214-224.
19. Simon J., Doederlein L., McIntosh A.S., Metaxiotis D., Bock H.G., Wolf S.I. The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. Gait Posture 2006, 23:411-424.
20. Stebbins J., Harrington M., Thompson N., Zavatsky A., Theologis T. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. Gait Posture 2006, 23:401-410.
21. Canseco K., Long J., Marks R., Harris G. Quantitative motion analysis in hallux valgus: rehabilitative insight. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007, 88:E10.
22. Canseco K., Long J., Marks R., Khazzam M., Harris G. Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee Foot Model. J Orthop Res 2008, 26(4):419-427.
23. Ness M.E., Long J., Marks R., Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture 2008, 27:331-339.
24. Garrow A.P., Papageorgiou A., Silman A.J., Thomas E., Jayson M.I., Macfarlane G.J. The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001, 91(2):74-78.
25. Menz H.B., Munteanu S.E. Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology 2005, 44:1061-1066.
26. Bus S.A., de Lange A. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech 2005, 20:892-899.
27. Grood E.S., Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983, 105:136-144.
28. Gage J.R., DeLuca P.A., Davis RB Clinical gait analysis. A focus on interpretation 1997, Connecticut Childrens Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
29. Perry J. Gait analysis 1992, SLACK Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
30. Stebbins J., Theologis T. Comparative motion of the foot during walking for men, women and children. Gait Posture 2009, 30S:S1-S153.
31. Michaud T.C. Foot orthoses and other forms of conservative foot care 1993, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 1-249.
32. Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice 2006, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp. 83-94.
33. Tranberg R., Karlsson D. The relative skin movement of the foot: a 2D roentgen photogrammetric study. Clin Biomech 1998, 13:71-76.
34. Cappozzo A., Catani F., Leardini A., Benedetti M.G., Della C.U. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech 1996, 11:90-100.