Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease in women: What's next?

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 147-154

  Phillips, Lawrence M ^a   Mieres, Jennifer H ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Non invasive imaging; Sex specific; Women

Indexed keywords

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953542319     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-010-0084-y     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Deaths: National Vital Statistics Reports-Deaths: Final Data for 2005. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56-10.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2009.
2. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, et al.: Explaining the decrease in U. S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:2388-2398.
3. Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ, et al.: Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 Update. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1230-1250. (Pubitemid 46400344)
4. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009, 119:480-486.
5. Murphy SL: Death: Final data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2000, 48:1-105.
6. Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, et al.: Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. Part 1: Gender differences in traditional an novel risk factors, symptom evaluation and gender optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:4S-20S.
7. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, et al.: Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation 2005, 111:682-696.
8. Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, et al.: Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: Gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47(3 Suppl):S21-S29.
9. Shaw LJ, Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN: Women and ischemic heart disease: Evolving knowledge. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1561-1575. In this state-of-the-art paper, the authors discuss the spectrum of etiologies involved in IHD in women. Dysfunction of the microvasculature is implicated as a cause of symptoms and worse prognosis in the absence of obstructive disease. An additional leading culprit is abnormal reactivity in the small heart arteries leading to poor blood flow (ischemia) to the heart muscle
10. Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, et al.: Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: A report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:843-850. This study reports on cardiovascular events (MI, death, stroke, heart failure) between the symptomatic cohort of women from the WISE study and the asymptomatic cohort of women from the St. James WTH Project. Women with symptoms and signs suggestive of ischemia but without obstructive CAD are at elevated risk for cardiovascular events compared with asymptomatic community-based women.
11. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al.: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). Available at http:// www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/ 1032279013658exercise. pdf. Accessed December 2009.
12. Kwok YS, Kim C, Grady D, et al.: Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83:660-666.
13. Alexander KP, Shaw LJ, Shaw LK, et al.: Value of exercise treadmill testing in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32:1657-1664. (Published erratum appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 33:289.)
14. Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF, et al.: Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: The St. James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation 2003, 108:1554-1559.
15. Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, et al.: Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women. JAMA 2003, 290:1600-1607.
16. Gulati M, Black HR, Shaw LJ, et al.: The prognostic value of a nomogram for exercise capacity in women. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:468-475. (Pubitemid 41127291)
17. Shaw LJ, Olson MB, Kip K, et al.: The value of estimated functional capacity in estimating outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:36S-43S.
18. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al.: ACC/AHA/ ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography- summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:954-970.
19. Williams MJ, Marwick TH, O'Gorman D, et al.: Comparison of exercise echocardiography with an exercise score to diagnose coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1994, 74:435-438.
20. Arruda-Olson AM, Jracan EM, Mahoney DW, et al.: Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 5,978 patients: Is there a gender difference? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39:625-631.
21. Shaw LJ, Vassey C, Sawada S, et al.: Impact of gender on risk stratification by exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography: Long-term mortality in 4,234 women and 6,898 men. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:447-456.
22. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, et al.: The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:227-237.
23. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al.: ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging- executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines of the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation 2003, 108:1404-1418.
24. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, et al.: American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease-the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women. J Nucl Cardiol 2003, 10:95-101.
25. Hansen CL, Crabbe D, Rubin S: Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996, 28:1214-1219.
26. Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, et al.: Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99 m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29:69-77.
27. Santana-Boado C, Candell-Rivera J, Castell-Conesa J, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99 m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men. J Nucl Med 1998, 39:751-755.
28. Mieres JH, Makaryus AN, Cacciabaudo JM, et al.: Value of electrocardiographically gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in a cohort of symptomatic postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:1096-1099.
29. Elhendy A, Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, et al.: Accuracy of stress Tc-99 m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion tomography for the diagnosis and localization of coronary artery disease in women. J Nucl Cardiol 2006, 13:629-634. (Pubitemid 44283784)
30. Amanullah AM, Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, et al.: Identification of severe or extensive coronary artery disease in women by adenosine technetium-99 m sestamibi SPECT. Am J Cardiol 1997, 80:132-137.
31. Marwick TH, Shaw LJ, Lauer MS, et al.: The noninvasive prediction of cardiac mortality in men and women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group. Am J Med 1999, 106:172-178.
32. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE: Prognostic value of stress gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004, 11:171-185.
33. Berman DS, Kang X, Hayes SW, et al.: Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:1125-1133
34. Bellasi A, Raggi P, Merz CN, Shaw LJ: New insights into ischemic heart disease in women. Cleve Clin J Med 2007, 74:585-594. This paper discusses the recent evidence on sex differences in CAD and possible strategies for detecting and assessing coronary disease in women.
35. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R: New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007, 115:1464-1480.
36. Heller GV, Calnon D, Dorbala S: Recent advances in cardiac PET and PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:962-969.
37. Dorbala S, Vangala D, Samson U, et al.: Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluation of the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: A 82 Rb PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2007, 48:349-358.
38. Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R, Curillova Z, et al.: Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:846-854.
39. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, et al.: Long-term prognostic value of 13 N-ammonia myocardial perfusion Positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 54:150-156.
40. de Vries J, DeJongste MJ, Jessurun GA, et al.: Myocardial perfusion quantification in patients suspected of cardiac syndrome X with positive and negative exercise testing: A [13-N] ammonia positron emission tomography study. Nucl Med Commun 2006, 27:791-794.
41. Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ: Gender-based differences in the prognostic value of coronary calcification. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2004, 13:273-283. (Pubitemid 38660524)
42. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al.: Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006, 114:1761-1791.
43. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, et al.: ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on CAC scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:378-402.
44. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al.: Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart 2008, 94:48-52.
45. Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, et al.: Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronaryCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:1045-1050.
46. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al.: Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1948-1953.
47. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Hucko T, et al.: Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. Heart 2009 August 16 (Epub ahead of print).
48. Wallace EL, Morgan TM, Walsh TF, et al.: Dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance results, predict cardiac prognosis in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:299-307.