Erratum to: Root distribution of under-planted European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) below the canopy of a mature Norway spruce stand as a function of light (Eur J Forest Res (2010) 129, (541), 10.1007/s10342-009-0352-9);Root distribution of under-planted European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) below the canopy of a mature Norway spruce stand as a function of light

European Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 531-539

  Matjaž, Čater ^a   Primož, Simončič ^a  

^a SLOVENIAN FORESTRY INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Beech; Biomass allocation; Interspecific competition; Light; Soil water content

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; CANOPY GAP; CORRELATION; DECIDUOUS TREE; LIGHT EFFECT; MORPHOLOGY; ROOT SYSTEM; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO; STAND STRUCTURE;

NORWAY;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 77953534237     PISSN: 16124669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0356-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (61)

1. Ammer C (2002) Response of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to root trenching of overstorey Picea abies. Scand J For Res 17: 408-416.
2. Ammer C, Bickel E, Kölling C (2008) Converting Norway spruce stands with beech-a review on arguments and techniques. Austrian J For Sci 125: 3-26.
3. ©Regent Instruments Inc., p 104.
4. Bauhus J, Messier C (1999) Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can J For Res 29: 260-273.
5. Beaudet M, Messier C (1998) Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch sugar maple and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Can J For Res 28: 1007-1015.
6. Bolte A, Villanueva I (2006) Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Eur J Forest Res 125: 15-26.
7. Bolte A, Hertel D, Ammer C, Schmid I, Nörr R, Kuhr M, Redde N (2003) Freilandmethoden zur untersuchung von baumwurzeln. Forstarchiv 74: 240-262.
8. Breznikar A, Mlinšek G, Cehner M, Grecs Z, Čater M (2006) Strategies of man-made spruce stands conversion at Pohorje. Studia Forestalia Slovenica. Slovenian Forestry Institute, pp 143-153.
9. Brunner A (1993) Die Entwicklung von Bergmischwaldkulturen in den Chiemgauer Alpen und eine Methodenstudie zur ökologischen Lichtmessung im Wald. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München 128.
10. Coll L, Balandier P, Picon-Cochard C, Prévosto B, Curt T (2003) Competition for water between beech seedlings and surrounding vegetation in different light and vegetation composition conditions. Ann For Sci 60: 593-600.
11. Collet C, Lanter O, Pardos M (2001) Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Ann For Sci 58: 127-134.
12. Comas LH, Bouma TJ, Eissenstat M (2002) Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia 132: 34-42.
13. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000) Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr 70: 171-207.
14. Cornelissen JHC, Castro DP, Hunt R (1996) Seedling growth. Allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. J Ecol 84: 755-765.
15. Curt T, Prevosto B (2003) Rooting strategy of naturally regenerated beech in silver birch and scots pine woodlands. Plant Soil 255: 265-279.
16. Curt T, Coll L, Prevosto B, Balandier P, Kunstler G (2005) Plasticity in growth. Biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition. Ann For Sci 62(1): 51-60.
17. Diaci J (2006) Fifty years of restoration in Norway spruce replacement forests in Slovenia. Forestalia Slovenica. Slovenian Forestry Institute, pp 56-67.
18. Emborg J (1998) Understory light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of near natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. Ecol Manag 106: 83-95.
19. Fotelli MN, Gessler A, Peuke AD, Rennenberg H (2001) Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus: responses of growth, water status and delta C-13 composition. New Phytol 151: 427-435.
20. Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G (2001) A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Funct Ecol 15: 688-695.
21. Gotz V (1994) Umwandlung reiner fichte in laubwald durch naturverjüngung. Allg For Zeitschrift 49: 511-514.
22. Grams TEE, Kozovits AR, Winkler JB, Sommerkorn M, Blaschke H, Häberle K-H, Matyssek R (2002) Quantifying competitiveness in woody plants. Plant Biol 4: 153-158.
23. Grubb PJ, Lee WG, Kollmann J, Wilson JB (1996) Interaction of irradiance and soil nutrient supply on growth of seedlings of ten European tall-shrub species and Fagus sylvatica. J Ecol 84: 827-840.
24. Hendriks CMA, Bianchi FJJA (1995) Root density and root biomass in pure and mixed forest stands of Douglas-fir and Beech. Neth J Agric Sci 43: 321-331.
25. Hüttl RF, Fink S (1998) Diagnostische Dugungsversuche zur revitalizierung geschadigter Fichtebestanden (Picea abiesKarst.) in Südwestdeutschland. Eur J Forest Res 107: 173-183.
26. Kazda M, Pichler M (1998) Priority assessment for conversion of Norway spruce forests through introduction of broadleaf species. For Ecol Manag 102: 245-258.
27. Kimmins JP (1997) Forest ecology, a foundation for sustainable management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p 596.
28. Knoke T, Ammer C, Stimm B, Mosandl R (2008) Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J Forest Res 127: 89-101.
29. Kobe RKS, Pacala SW, Silander JA, Canham CD (1996) Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecol Appl 5: 517-532.
30. Köstler JN, Brückner E, Bibelriether H (1968) Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Paul Parey, Hamburg, p 284.
31. Krauss HH (1997) Report on the need for liming of conversion stands on sites of the northeastern Germany lowlands. Beiträge für Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie 31(3): 125-133.
32. Larsen JB (1995) Ecological stability of forests and sustainable silviculture. For Ecol Manag 73: 85-96.
33. Leuschner C, Hertel D, Coners H, Büttner V (2001) Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis. Oecologia 126: 276-284.
34. Löf M (2000) Establishment and growth in seedlings of Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur: influence of interference from herbaceous vegetation. Can J For Res 30: 855-864.
35. Lüpke B, Spellmann H (1997) Aspekte der stabilität und des wachstums von mischbeständen aus fichte und buche als grundlage für waldbauliche entscheidungen. Forstarchiv 68(5): 167-179.
36. Lüpke B, Ammer C, Braciamacchie M, Brunner A, Ceitel J, Collet C, Deuleuze C, Di Placido J, Huss J, Jankovic J, Kantor P, Larsen JB, Lexer M, Löf M, longauer R, Madsen P, Modrzynski J, Mosandl R, Pampe A, Pommerenig A, Stefancik J, Tesar V, Thompson R, Zientarski J (2004) Silvicultural strategies for conversion. In: Spiecker H, Hansen J, Klimo E, Skovsgaard JP, Sterba H, Teuffel K (eds) Norway spruce conversion-options and consequences. Leiden, Boston, Brill, European forest Institute research report 18, pp 121-164.
37. Madsen P (1995) Effects of soil water content, fertilization, light, weed competition and -seedbed type on natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica). For Ecol Manag 72: 251-264.
38. Minotta G, Pinzauti S (1996) Effects of light and soil fertility on growth. Leaf chlorophyll content and nutrient use efficiency of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. For Ecol Manag 86: 61-71.
39. Nadezhdina N, Cermak J (2003) Instrumental methods for studies of structure and function of root systems of large trees. J Exp Bot 54: 1511-1521.
40. Otto H-J (1986) Standörtliche voraussetzungen. Ziele und waldbautechnik in fichten-buchen-mischbeständen des harzes. Allg Forst J Ztg 157: 214-222.
41. Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vanderklein DW, Bushena C (1998) Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Funct Ecol 12: 327-338.
42. Ritter E (2004) The effect of gap formation on soil temperature, soil water and processes in the nitrogen cycle in temperate beech forests of different management intensities, PhD thesis, Department of Applied Ecology, Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning, KVL, Copenhagen, p 232.
43. Ritter E, Vesterdal L (2004) The effect of gap formation on biogeochemical processes in Danish forests. In: Report of the NAT-MAN project WP 4: Gap - integrated experiments. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, p 36.
44. Robič D, Accetto M (2001) Pregled sintaksonomskega sistema gozdnega in obgozdnega rastlinja Slovenije.-Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire Biotehniške fakultete. Ljubljana, typescript, pp 18.
45. Rothe A (1997) Einfluss des baumartenanteils auf durchwurzelung. wasserhaushalt. Stoffhaushalt und zuwachsleitung eines fichten-buchen-mischbestandes am standort hoglwald. For Forschungsber München 163: 1-213.
46. Rysavy T, Roloff A (1994) Ursachen der vereschung in mischbeständen und vorschläge zu ihrer vermeidung. Forst und Holz 49: 392-395.
47. Schenk S (1994) Erfahrungen zum vorbau für die umwandlung. AFZ-Allgemeine-Forst- Zeitschrift 49(10): 519-520.
48. Schmid I (2002) The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic Appl Ecol 3(4): 339-355.
49. Schmid I, Kazda M (2001) Vertical distribution and radial growth of coarse roots in pure and mixed stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies. Can J For Res 31: 539-548.
50. Schmid I, Kazda M (2002) Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. For Ecol Manag 159: 37-47.
51. Schmid I, Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, (2005) Root distribution and competition. In: Oleskog G, Löf M (eds). The ecological and silvicultural bases for underplanting beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) below Norway spruce shelterwood (Picea abies L. Karst.). (Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt. Band 139), Frankfurt: J. D. Sauerländer's Verlag, pp 28-39.
52. Schraml J, Rennenberg H (2001) Untersuchungen zur Stress-Sensitivität von Ökotypen der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forstw Cbl 119: 51-61.
53. Spellmann H, Wagner S (1993) Entscheidunghsilfen für die Verjüngungsplanung in Fichtenbeständen zum Voranbauder Buche im Harz. Forst-und-Holz 48(17): 483-490.
54. Urbančič M, Kutnar L (2006) Site conditions of the plot "Brička" and comparisons with other "Sustman" plots. Studia Forestalia Slovenica. Slovenian Forestry Institute, pp 68-85.
55. Valladares F, Chico JM, Aranda I, Balaguer L, Dizengremel P, Manrique E, Dreyer E (2002) The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees 16: 395-403.
56. van Hees AFM, Clerkx APPM (2003) Shading and root-shoot relations in saplings of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech. For Ecol Manag 176: 439-448.
57. Vilhar U, Nadezhdina N, Cermak J, Gasparek J, Urbančič M, Simončič P (2006) Measuring and modeling of the transpiration of underplanted beech in spruce stand on Pohorje. Studia Forestalia Slovenica. Slovenian Forestry Institute, p 86-103.
58. Wagner S (1994) Strahlungsschätzung in Wäldern durch hemisphärische Fotos - Methode und Anwendung, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A. Bd 123, Göttingen, p 166.
59. Welander NT, Ottosson B (1998) The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For Ecol Manag 107: 117-126.
60. Wraber M (1969) Pflanzengeographische stellung und gliederung sloweniens.- vegetatio. The Hague 17: 176-199.
61. Zerbe S (2002) Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations. For Ecol Manag 167: 27-42.