Reply to commentaries

Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 259-266

  Parsons, Michael ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953530055     PISSN: 10481885     EISSN: 19409222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10481880902945999     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Aron, L. (1992). Interpretation as expression of the analyst's subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 29-51.
2. Bergmann, M. (Ed.). (2000). The Hartmann era. New York: Other Press.
3. Freud, S. (1919). The uncanny. Standard Edition, 17, 219-256.
4. Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Loewald, H. (1980). Papers on psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Mitchell, S., & Aron, L. (Eds.). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
7. Parsons, M. (2006). The analyst's countertransference to the psychoanalytic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1183-1198.
8. Parsons, M. (2007). Raiding the inarticulate: the internal analytic setting and listening beyond countertransference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 88, 1441-1456.
9. Parsons, M. (2009). Après-coup and avant-coup: Death and the primal scene. Unpublished.
10. Segal, H. (2006). Reflections on truth, tradition and the psychoanalytic tradition of truth. American Imago, 63, 283-292.
11. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.