Comparative evaluation of radial impellers efficiency for bioreactors with stirred bed of immobilized cells 4. Studies on mechanical effect on biocatalysts integrity

Romanian Biotechnological Letters

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 4931-4939

  Caşcaval, Dan ^a   Galaction, Anca Irina ^b   Lupǎşteanu, Anca Marcela ^a  

^a GHEORGHE ASACHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

^b GRIGORE T POPA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Curved bladed turbine; Disperser sawtooth; Immobilized cells; Mechanical lysis; Paddle with six blades; Pitched bladed turbine; Pumper mixer; Radial impeller; Smith turbine; Stirred bed; Yeasts

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 77953514815     PISSN: 12245984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wijffels R.H., Buitelaar R.M., Bucke C., Tramper J., Immobilized Cells: Basics & Applications. Progress in Biotechnology, vol. 11, Editorial Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996.
2. Tisher W., Wedekind F., Fessner H.D., Immobilized Enzymes: Methods and Applications. Biocatalysis, Topics in Current Chemistry, 95-126. (1999).
3. Angelova M.B., Pashova S.B., Slokoska C., Enzyme Microb. Technol., 26, 544-549. (2000).
4. Caşcaval D., Oniscu C., Galaction A.-I., Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology. 2. Bioreactors, InterGlobal, Iaşi, 2002.
5. Galaction A.I., Lupasteanu A.M., Cascaval D., Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 6, 101-110. (2007).
6. Galaction A.I., Lupǎşteanu A.M., Caşcaval D., Roum. Biotechnol. Lett., 14, 4282-4293. (2009).
7. Borglum G.B., Marshall J.J., Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 9, 117-130. (1984).
8. Tan Q., Song Q., Wei D., Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 1166-1172. (2006).
9. Kennedy J.F., Cabral J.M.S., in Applied Biochemistry and Bioengineering (I. Chibata, L.B. Wingard eds.), vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, 1983, pp. 53.
10. Linko P., Linko Y.Y., Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 1, 289-338. (1984).
11. Luong J.H.T., Tseng M.C., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 19, 207-216. (1984).
12. Angenent L.T., Dague R.R., A laboratory-scale comparison of the UASB and ASBR processes, 50th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, 1983, pp. 365.
13. Zhang R., Yin Y., Sung S., Dague R.R., Anaerobic treatment of swine waste by the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor, 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, 1996, pp. 315.
14. Fernandes L., Kennedy K.J., Ning Z., Water Res., 27, 1619-1628. (1993).
15. Timur H., Östurk I., Water Res., 33, 3225-3230. (1999).
16. Bagley M., Brodkorb T.S., Water Environ. Res., 71, 1320-1332. (1999).
17. Van't Riet K., Tramper J., Basic Bioreactor Design, M. Dekker Inc., New York, 1991, pp. 183.
18. Oniscu C., Caşcaval D., Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology. 1. Biotechnological processes engineering, InterGlobal, Iaşi,;1;2002.
19. Caşcaval D., Galaction A.I., Turnea M., J. Ind. Microb. Biotechnol., 34, 35-47. (2007).
20. Galaction A.I., Lupǎşteanu A.M., Turnea M., Caşcaval D., Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Quart., 15, (2009) in press..
21. Williams D., Munecke D. M., Biotechnol. Bioeng., 23, 1813-1825 (1981).
22. Fasano J.B., Bakker A., Penney W.R., Advanced impeller geometry boosts liquid agitation, in Advanced liquid agitaton, AIChE Meeting, 1999, pp. 110.