Enabling resource sharing in language generation: An abstract reference architecture

2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Cahill, L ^a   Doran, C ^a,c   Evans, R ^a   Kibble, R ^a   Mellish, C ^b   Paiva, D ^a   Reape, M ^b   Scott, D ^a   Tipper, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

ABSTRACT DATA; EXISTING SYSTEMS; LANGUAGE GENERATION; MODULAR DEVELOPMENT; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; RESOURCE SHARING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953504499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Brachman, R. and J. Schmolze, 1985. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9:171-216.
2. Cahill, Lynne, Christy Doran, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper, 1999a. Towards a Reference Architecture for Natural Language Generation Systems. Technical Report ITRI-99-14, Information Technology Research Institute (ITRI), University of Brighton. Available at http://www.itri.brighton. ac.uk/projects/rags.
3. Cahill, Lynne, Christy Doran, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper, 1999b. In Search of a Reference Architecture for NLG Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Toulouse.
4. Cahill, Lynne and Mike Reape, 1998. Component tasks in applied NLG systems. Technical Report ITRI-99-05, ITRI, University of Brighton. Obtainable at http://www.itri.brighton. ac.uk/projects/rags/.
5. Calder, Jo, Roger Evans, Chris Mellish, and Mike Reape, 1999. "Free choice" and templates: how to get both at the same time. In "May I speak freely?" Between templates and free choice in natural language generation, number D-99-01. Saarbrücken, pages 19-24.
6. Elhadad, M. and J. Robin, 1992. Controlling content realization with functional unification grammars. In Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 587. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pages 89-104.
7. Hirschman, Lynette and Nancy Chinchor (eds.), 1997. MUC-7 Proceedings. Science Applications International Corporation. See www.muc.saic.com.
8. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle, 1993. From discourse to logic: Introduction to model theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht; London: Kluwer.
9. Kasper, Robert T., 1989. A flexible interface for linking applications to PENMAN's sentence generator. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language. Philadelphia. Available from USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA.
10. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson, 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Technical Report RS-87-190, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina Del Rey, CA. Also appears in Livia Polanyi, editor, The Structure of Discourse, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1987.
11. Mellish, Chris, Roger Evans, Lynne Cahill, Christy Doran, Roger Evans, Daniel Paiva, Mike Reape, Donia Scott, and Neil Tipper, 2000. A Representation for Complex and Evolving Data Dependencies in Generation. In Proceedings of ANLP-NAACL2000. Seattle.
12. Mittal, V. O., J. D. Moore, G. Carenini, and S. Roth, 1998. Describing complex charts in natural language: A caption generation system. Computational Linguistics, 24(3):431-468.
13. Nunberg, Geoffrey, 1990. The Linguistics of Punctuation. CSLI Lecture Notes, No. 18. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
14. Paiva, Daniel, 1998. A survey of applied natural language generation systems. Technical Report ITRI-98-03, Information Technology Research Institute (ITRI), University of Brighton. Available at http://www.itri.brighton. ac.uk/techreports.
15. Reiter, Ehud, 1994. Has a consensus NL generation architecture appeared and is it psycholinguistically plausible? In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Kennebunkport, Maine.