PICTIOL: A case study in participatory design

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 206, Issue , 2006, Pages 191-198

  Farrell, Vivienne ^a   Farrell, Graham ^a   Mouzakis, Kon ^a   Pilgrim, Chris ^a   Byrt, Pauline ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

collaborative online learning; CSCW; graphical user interface; participatory design; PICTIVE; problem based learning

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE ONLINE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE USERS; EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE; ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS; OFF-CAMPUS STUDENTS; ONLINE LEARNING; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; TESTING TECHNIQUE;

CURRICULA; DESIGN; E-LEARNING; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; GROUPWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TESTING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77953503946     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1228175.1228209     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bailey, B. P. & Konstan, J. A. Are Informal Tools Better? Comparing DEMAIS, Pencil and Paper, and Authorware for Early Multimedia Design. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 313-320.
2. Chandler, C. D., Lo, G. & Sinha, A. K. Multimodal Theater: Extending Low Fidelity Paper Prototyping to Multimodal Applications. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 874-875.
3. Cook, D. J. & Bailey, B. P. Designers' Use of Paper and the Implications for Informal Tools. In Proc. OzCHI 2005, (2005), Long papers.
4. Everitt, K. M., Klemmer, S. R., Lee, R. & Landay, J. A. Two worlds Apart: Bridging the Gap Between Physical and Virtual Media for Distributed Design Collaboration. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 553-560.
5. Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Reisin, F.-M., Schmidt, G. & Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 4 (1989), 253-350. (Pubitemid 20698175)
6. Gould, J. D. & Lewis, C. H. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 3 (1985), 300-311.
7. Herbsleb, J. D. & Kuwana, E. Preserving knowledge in design projects: What designers need to know. In Proc. CHI 1993, ACM Press (1993), 7-14.
8. Jones, D. (1996). What is PBL?, http://edweb.sdsu.edu/clrit/ learningresource/PBL/WhatisPBL.html. Accessed May 2006.
9. Landay, J. A. & Myers, B. A. Interactive Sketching for the Early Stages of User Interface Design. In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995), 7-14.
10. Liu, J.-S. & Sycara, K. P. Multiagent Coordination in Tightly Coupled Task Scheduling [Online], http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~umesh/agents/ Multiagent%20Coordination%20in%20Tightly%20Coupled%20Task%20Scheduling%20(1996). pdf. Accessed June 6, 2006.
11. Miller, D. S., Smith, J. G. & Muller, M. J. TelePICTIVE: computer-supported collaborative GUI design for designers with diverse expertise. In Proc. UIST 1992, ACM Press (1992), 151-160.
12. Muller, M. PICTIVE - An exploration in participatory design. In Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991), 225-231.
13. Muller, M., Blomberg, J., Carter, K., Dykstra, K. & Madsden, K. Participatory design in Britain and North America: Responses to the "Scandinavian Challenge". In Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991), 389-392.
14. Muller, M. J. Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 455-462.
15. Newman, M. W., Lin, J., Hong, J. I. & Landay, J. A. DENIM: An Informal Web Site Design Tool Inspired by Observations of Practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 3 (2003), 259-324.
16. Nielsen, J. (1994). Ten Usability Heuristics [Online], http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic-list.html, Accessed June 5, 2006.
17. Nielsen, J., Bush, R. M., Dayton, T., Mond, N. E., Muller, M. J. & Root, R. W. Teaching Experienced Users to Design Graphical User Interfaces. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 557-564.
18. Pross, H. (2002). Problem-based learning: Student-Tutor Handbook. Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, http://meds.queensu. ca/medicine/pbl/PBLHndbk2002.pdf. Accessed May 2006
19. Rudd, J., Stern, K. & Isensee, S. The Low vs. High Fidelity Prototyping Debate. Interactions, 3, 1 (1996), 76-85. (Pubitemid 126036823)
20. Spencer, R. The Streamlined Cognitive Walkthrough Method, working around social constraints encountered in a software development company. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 353-359.
21. Trigg, R. (1995). Participatory Design: Notes from a classic article by Kristen Nygaard: Nygaard, K. (1975). Kunnskaps-strategi for fagbevegelsen (Skills strategy for trade unions). Nordisk Forum 6, 10(2), 15-27., http://www.cpsr.org/prevsite/program/workplace/nygaard-75-notes.html. Accessed May 2006.
22. Trigg, R. & Clement, A. (2000). Participatory Design [Online], http://www.cpsr.org/prevsite/program/workplace/PD.html/. Accessed May 2006.
23. Wharton, C. W., Reiman, J., Lewis, C. H. & Polson, P. (1994) The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In Nielson, J. K. & Mack, R. L. (Eds.) Usability Inspection Methods. New York, Wiley.