Behaviour of an old masonry tunnel due to tunnelling-induced ground settlement

Geotechnique

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 927-938

  Mohamad, H ^a   Bennett, P J ^b   Soga, K ^b   Mair, R J ^b   Bowers, K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c London Underground Modernisation Programme   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buried structures; Deformation; Field instrumentation; Monitoring; Soil structure interaction; Tunnels

Indexed keywords

BRILLOUIN; BURIED STRUCTURE; DISTRIBUTED STRAIN; FIELD INSTRUMENTATION; GROUND SETTLEMENT; LONGITUDINAL SECTION; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; OPTICAL FIBRE; OPTICAL TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY; TOTAL STATION; TUNNEL DEFORMATION; VISUAL INSPECTION;

DEFORMATION; INSTRUMENTS; MASONRY MATERIALS; MONITORING; OPTICAL FIBERS; STRAIN;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

BURIED STRUCTURE; CRACKING; DEFORMATION MECHANISM; FLEXURE; GROUND CONDITIONS; GROUND SETTLEMENT; MASONRY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REFLECTOMETRY; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRAIN ANALYSIS; STRAIN MEASUREMENT; TUNNEL; TUNNEL LINING; TUNNELING; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION;

ENGLAND; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77953503295     PISSN: 00168505     EISSN: 17517656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/geot.8.P.074     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Addenbrooke, T. I. & Potts, D. M. (2001). Twin tunnel interaction surface and subsurface effects. Int. J. Geomechanics 1, No. 3, 249-271.
2. Attewell, P. B. & Woodman, J. P. (1982). Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunnelling in soil. Ground Engng 15, No. 8, 13-22, 36.
3. Bloodworth, A. G., Houlsby, G. T., Burd, H. J. & Augarde, C. E. (2001). Three-dimensional modelling of the interaction between buildings and tunnelling operations. Proceedings of the international conference on the response of buildings to excavation induces ground movements, SP201, pp. 189-198. London: London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA)
4. Boscardin, M. D. & Cording, E. J. (1989). Building response to excavation-induced settlement. ASCE J. Geotech. Engng 115, No. 1, 1-21.
5. Burland, J. B. & Wroth, C. P. (1974). Settlement of buildings and associated damage. Proceedings of the conference on settlement of structures, pp. 611-654. London: Pentech Press
6. Franzius, J. N., Potts, D. M. & Burland, J. B. (2006). The response of surface structures to tunnel construction. Proc. ICE, Geotech. Engng 159, No. 1, 3-17.
7. Horiguchi, T., Kurashima, T. & Koyamada, Y. (1994). 1-m spatial resolution measurement of distributed Brillouin frequency shift in single-mode fibers. Proceedings of NIST/IEEE symposium on optical fiber measurements, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 73-76.
8. Klar, A., Bennett, P. J., Soga, K., et al. (2006). Distributed strain measurement for pile foundations. Proc. ICE, Geotech. Engng 159, No. 3, 135-144.
9. Kim, S. H. (1996). Model testing and analysis of interactions between tunnels in clay. PhD thesis, Oxford University.
10. Mair, R. J., Taylor, R. N. & Burland, J. B. (1996). Prediction of ground movements and assessment of building damage due to bored tunnelling. International symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, pp. 713-718. Rotterdam: Balkema.
11. th Int. Symposium Field Measmt Geomech., Boston (eds J. Di Maggio and P. Osborn), ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 175. Reston, VA, USA: ASCE (CD-ROM).
12. Mohamad, H. (2008). Distributed optical fibre strain sensing of geotechnical structures. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
13. Naruse, H., Komatsu, K., Fujihashi, K. & Okutsu, M. (2005). Telecommunication tunnel monitoring system based on distributed optical fiber strain measurement. 17th Int. Conf. Optical Fiber Sensor, Proc. SPIE 5855, 168-171.
14. Naruse, H., Uehara, H., Deguchi, T., et al. (2007). Application of a distributed fibre optic strain sensing system to monitoring changes in the state of an underground mine. Measmt Sci. Technol. 18, 3202-3210.
15. Niklès, M. (2007). Fibre optic distributed scattering sensing system: perspectives and challenges for high performance applications. Proc. SPIE 6619, 66190D.
16. Samuel, H., Mair, R. J., Lu, Y. C., et al. (1999). The effects of boring a new tunnel under an existing masonry tunnel. Proceedings of international symposium geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, pp. 293-298. Rotterdam: Balkema.
17. Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analyt. Chem. 36, No. 8, 1627-1639.
18. Shiba, K., Kumagai, H., Watanabe, K., et al. (2001). Fiber optic distributed senor for monitoring of concrete structures. The 3rd Int. Workshop Struct. Health Monitoring, Stanford, California, pp. 459-468.
19. Standing, J. R. & Selman, R. (2001). The response to tunnelling of existing tunnels at Waterloo and Westminster. In Building response to tunnelling: case studies from the Jubilee Line Extension (eds J. B. Burland, J. R. Standing and F. M. Jardine), vol. 2: Case studies, pp. 509-546. London: CIRIA and Thomas Telford.
20. th international conference of TC28 of the ISSMGE, The Netherlands, 15-17 June 2005 (eds K. J. Bakker, A. Bezuijen, W. Broere and E. A. Kwast), pp. 687-693. London: Taylor and Francis.
21. Vorster, T. E. B., Mair, R. J., Soga, K., Klar, A. & Bennett, P. J. (2006). Using BOTDR fibre optic sensors to monitor pipeline behaviour during tunnelling. Proc. 3rd Eur. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Granada, pp. 930-937.