The diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography compared with invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

European Heart Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 1916-1923

  Chao, Shu Ping ^a   Law, Wai Yip ^a   Kuo, Chu Jen ^a   Hung, Huei Fong ^a   Cheng, Jun Jack ^a   Lo, Huey Ming ^a   Shyu, Kou Gi ^a,b  

^a SHIN KONG WU HO SU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

256 Row computed tomography; Computed tomographic angiography; Invasive coronary angiography; Multi detector computed tomography

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; IOVERSOL; PROPRANOLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953498744     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: 15229645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq072     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Fieno DS, Germano G, Wong ND, Kang X, Rozanski A. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1107-1118.
2. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, Legako RD, Leon DF, Murray JA, Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Watson RM, Ritchie JL, Gibbons RJ, Cheitlin MD, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Russell RO Jr, Ryan TJ, Smith SC Jr. ACC/AHA Guidelines for coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33: 1756-1824.
3. Prat-Gonzalez S, Sanz J, Garcia M. Cardiac CT: indications and limitations. J Nucl Med Technol 2008;36:18-24.
4. Voros S. What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of volumetric CT scanning?. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:67-70.
5. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner MI, Vorobiol G, Nallamshetty l, Mitsouras D, Ersoy H, Mather RT, Judy PF, Cai T, Coyner K, Schsultz K, Whitmore AG, Di Carli MF. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:535-546.
6. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, Veit-Haibach P, Tatsugami F, von Schulthess GK, Kaufmann PA. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-197.
7. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, Gaeperti O, Valenta I, Tatsugami F, Wyss CA, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J 2008;29:3037-3042.
8. Weigold WG, Olszewski ME, Walker MJ. Low-dose prospective gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25: 217-230.
9. Tsai IC, Lee WL, Tsao CR, Chang Y, Chen MC, Lee T, Liao WC. Comprehensive evaluation of ischemic heart disease using MDCT. AJR 2008;191:64-72.
10. Carrigan TP, Nair D, Schoenhagen P, Curtin RJ, Popovic ZB, Halliburton S, Kuzmiak S, White RD, Flamm SD, Desai MY. Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2009;30:362-371.
11. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324-2336.
12. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to invasive coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28:3042-3050.
13. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, Flohr T, Heindel W, Fischbach R, Maintz D. 64-versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41:22-27.
14. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, Baum U, Kuettner A, Ropers U, Bautz W, Daniel WG, Anders K. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2567-2572. (Pubitemid 44627301)
15. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, de Jaegere PP, de Feyter PJ. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1879-1885.
16. Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E, Geibel-Zehender A, Bode C, Langer M, Bley T. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 2006;27:976-980.
17. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Med Assoc 2007;298:317-323.
18. Walker MJ, Olszewski ME, Desai MY, Halliburton SS, Flamm SD. New radiation dose saving technologies for 256-slice cardiac computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:189-199.
19. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, Walker S, Fraser C, Jia X, Waugh N. 64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008;94: 1386-1393.
20. Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Treyer V, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering verssu invasive coronary angiography. Heart 2009;95:1656-1661.
21. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Rist C, Buhmann S, Knez A, Reister MF, Becker CR. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1409-1415.