Reflecting on the design and implementation issues of virtual environments

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 179-195

  Wingrave, Chadwick A ^a   LaViola Jr , Joseph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953498510     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.19.2.179     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. 3DUI Listserv. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://people.cs.vt.edu/bowman/3dui.org/3DUI_mailing_list.html.
2. Alice.org. (n.d.). Retrieved from Alice: An Educational Software that teaches students computer programming in a 3D environment: http://www.alice.org.
3. Blackwell, A., & Green, T. (2000). A cognitive dimensions questionnaire optimized for users. Workshop on the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, 137-154.
4. Bowman, D., & McMahon, R. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? IEEE Computer, 40(7), 36-43.
5. Bowman, D., Gabbard, J., & Hix, D. (2002). Survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: Classification and comparison of methods. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(4), 404-424.
6. Bowman, D., Johnson, D., & Hodges, L. (2001). Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(1), 75-95.
7. Bowman, D., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J., & Poupyrev, I. (2004). 3D user interfaces: Theory and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Brooks, F. (1987). No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer, 20(4), 10-19.
9. Burns, E., Razzaque, S., Panter, A., Whitton, M., McCallus, M., & Brooks, F. (2005). The hand is slower than the eye: A quantitative exploration of visual dominance over pro-prioception. IEEE Virtual Reality, 3-10.
10. Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 181-212.
11. Conway, M., Audia, S., Burnette, R., Cosgrove, D., Christiansen, K., Deline, R., et al. (2000). Alice: Lessons learned from building a 3D system for novices. CHI, 486-493.
12. Davis, A. (1993). Software requirements: Objects, functions and states (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Ellis, S., Young, M., Adelstein, B., & Ehrlich, S. (1999). Discrimination of changes in latency during voluntary hand movement of virtual objects. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1182-1186.
14. Green, M., & Jacob, R. (1991). SIGGRAPH '90 workshop report: Software architectures and metaphors for non-WIMP user interfaces. Computer Graphics, 25(3), 229-235.
15. Green, T. (1989). Cognitive dimensions of notations. In A. Sutcliffe & L. Macauley (Eds.), People and Computers V (pp. 443-460).
16. Harel, D., & Politi, M. (1998). Modeling reactive systems with statecharts: The STATEMATE approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Herndon, K., Van Dam, A., & Gleicher, M. (1994). Workshop on the challenges of 3D interaction. SIGCHI Bulletin, 26(4),1-9.
18. Hutchins, E. (1987). Metaphors for interface design. Workshop on Multimodal Dialogues Including Voice. Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego.
19. Jacob, R., Deligiannidis, L., & Morrison, S. (1999). A soft- ware model and specification language for non-WIMP user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(1), 1-46.
20. Jacob, R., Girouard, A., Hirschfield, L., Horn, M., Shaer, O., Solovey, E., et al. (2008). Reality-based interaction: A framework for post-WIMP interfaces. CHI, 201-210.
21. Kessler, D., Bowman, D., & Hodges, L. (2000). The simple virtual environment library: An extensible framework for building VE applications. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 187-208.
22. Krueger, M. (1996). Virtual (reality intelligence). In B. Gorayska & J. Mey (Eds.), Cognitive technology: In search of the humane interface. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. LaViola, J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. SIGCHI Bulletin, 2(2), 47-56.
24. Lehman, M. (1980). Programs, life cycles and the laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE, 15(3), 1060-1076.
25. Mankoff, J., Hudson, S., & Abowd, G. (2000). Interaction techniques for ambiguity resolution in recognition-based interfaces. User Interface Software and Technology, 11-20.
26. Mankoff, J., Hudson, S., & Abowd, G. (2007). OOPS: A toolkit supporting mediation techniques for resolving ambiguity in recognition-based interfaces. Computers and Graphics Special Issue on Calligraphic Interfaces, 24(6), 819-834.
27. Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M., & Brooks, M. (2003). Effects of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. IEEE Virtual Reality, 141-148.
28. Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani (The uncanny valley). Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
29. Myers, B. (1991). Separating application code from toolkits: Eliminating the spaghetti of call-backs. User Interface Software and Technologies, 211-220.
30. Myers, B. (1993). Why are human-computer interfaces difficult to design and implement? Technical Report CMU-CS-93-183. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
31. Myers, B., Hudson, S., & Pausch, R. (2000). Past, present and future of user interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 3-28.
32. Park, K., & Kenyon, R. (1999). Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment. IEEE Virtual Reality, 104-111.
33. Pausch, R., Burnette, T., Brockway, D., & Weiblen, M. (1995). Navigation and locomotion in virtual worlds via flight into hand-held miniatures. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 399-400.
34. Pausch, R., Conway, M., & Deline, R. (1992). Lessons learned from SUIT, the simple user interface toolkit. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(4), 320-344.
35. Payne, C., Allgood, C., Chewar, C., Holbrook, C., & McCrickard, D. (2003). Generalizing interface design knowledge: Lessons learned from developing a claims library. Information Reuse and Integration, 362-369.
36. Pierce, J., & Pausch, R. (2006). Generating 3D interaction techniques by identifying and breaking assumptions. IEEE Virtual Reality, 15-21.
37. Polys, N., & Ray, A. (2006). Supporting mixed reality interfaces through X3D specification. Workshop on Specification of Mixed Reality User Interfaces: Approaches, Languages, Standardization in IEEE Virtual Reality, 29-32.
38. Razzaque, S., Swapp, D., Slater, M., Whitton, M., & Steed, A. (2002). Redirected walking in place. Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Reality, 123-130.
39. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
40. Selic, B. (2003). The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Software, 20(5), 19-25.
41. Shaer, O., Jacob, R., Green, M., &Luyten, K. (2008). User interface description language for next generation user interfaces. CHI Workshop.
42. Shaw, C., Green, M., Liang, J., & Sun, Y. (1993). Decoupled simulation in virtual reality with the MR toolkit. Transactions on Information Systems, 11(3), 287-317.
43. Steed, A. (2008). Some useful abstractions for re-usable virtual environment platform. SEARIS Workshop at IEEE Virtual Reality.
44. Stytz, M. (1996). Distributed virtual environments. Computer Graphics and Applications, 16(3), 19-31.
45. Sutcliffe, A. (2000). On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 197-221.
46. Weinberg, G. (1998). The psychology of computer programming (silver ed.). New York: Dorset House.
47. Wingrave, C. (2001). Nuance-oriented virtual environments (Unpublished masters thesis). Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
48. Wingrave, C. (2006). Understanding the limits and benefits of a 3D interface specification. IEEE VR Workshop on Specification of Mixed Reality User Interfaces, 12-15.
49. Wingrave, C. (2008). Concept-oriented design in chasm: Conversational domain language inspired 3D user interface design and development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
50. Wingrave, C. (2009). 3DUI flavors beyond vanilla. SEARIS Workshop in IEEE Virtual Reality. Retrieved 3/25/10 from http://www.searis.net/index.php5/Workshop2009_Program.
51. Wingrave, C., &Bowman, D. (2005). Baseline factors for ray-casting selection. Proceedings on CD of Virtual Reality International.
52. Wingrave, C., & Bowman, D. (2008). Tiered developercentric representations for 3D interfaces: Concept-oriented design in Chasm. IEEE Virtual Reality, 193-200.
53. Wingrave, C., Haciahmetoglu, Y., & Bowman, D. (2006). Overcoming world in miniature limitations by a scaled and scrolling WIM. Symposium of 3D User Interfaces, 11-16.
54. Wingrave, C., LaViola, J., & Bowman, D. (2009). A natural, tiered and executable UIDL for 3D user interfaces based on concept-oriented design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(4), 1-36.
55. Wingrave, C., Tintner, R., Walker, B., Bowman, D., & Hodges, L. (2005). Exploring individual differences in raybased selection: Strategies and traits. IEEE Virtual Reality, 163-170.