Requirements variability models: Meta-model based transformations

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 214, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Laguna, Miguel A ^a   Gonzalez Baixauli, Bruno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

goals; model driven engineering

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION LEVEL; AUTOMATED TRANSFORMATIONS; GOAL MODELS; INSTANTIATION PROCESS; META MODEL; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; REQUIREMENTS VARIABILITY; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; TRANSFORMATION PROCESS; UML MODEL;

SOFTWARE DESIGN; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953498032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1234324.1234333     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. L. Bass, P. Clements, P. Donohoe, J. McGregor, and L. Northrop. Fourth product line practice workshop report. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-002 (ESC-TR-2000-002), Software Engineering Institute. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 (USA), 2000.
2. J. Bosch. Design & Use of Software Architecture. Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
3. G. Chastek, P. Donohoe, K. C. Kang, and S. Thiel. Product line analysis: A practical introduction. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2001-TR-001 ESC-TR-2001-001, Software Engineering Institute (Carnegie Mellon), Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 2001.
4. L. Chung, B. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
5. P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
6. K. Czarnecki and U. Eisenecker. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
7. K. Czarnecki and S. Helsen. Classification of model transformation approaches. In OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, 2003.
8. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker. Staged configuration through specialization and multi-level configuration of feature models. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(2), 2005.
9. S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, J. van Gurp, and J. Bosch. Model driven architecture as approach to manage variability in software product families. In Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications, CTIT Technical Report TR CTIT 03 27. University of Twente, http://trese.cs.utwente.nl/mdafa2003, 2003.
10. F. J. García, J. A. Barras, M. A. Laguna, and J. M. Marqués. Product line variability support by form and mecano model integration. ACM Software Engineering Notes, 27(1):35-38, January 2002.
11. B. González-Baixauli, M. Laguna, and J. Leite. Análisis de variabilidad con modelos de objetivos. In VII Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER-2004). Anais do WER04, pages 77-87, 2004.
12. B. González-Baixauli, J. Leite, and J. Mylopoulos. Visual variability analysis with goal models. In Proc. of the RE 2004, pages 198-207. Kyoto, Japan, IEEE Computer Society, Sept. 2004.
13. L. C. J. Mylopoulos and E. Yu. From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Communications of the ACM, 42(1):31-37, Jan. 1999.
14. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh. The Unified Software Development Process. Object Technology series. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
15. I. Jacobson, M. Griss, and P. Jonsson. Software Reuse. Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press. Addison Wesley Longman., 1997.
16. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Nowak, and S. Peterson. Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute (Carnegie Mellon), Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
17. K. C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, and K. Kim. Form: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Annals of Software Engineering, 5:143-168, 1998.
18. G. Kiczalez, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect oriented programming. In Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Object Oriented Programming, pages 220-242. Springer Verlag, 1997.
19. A. Kleppe, J. Warmer, and W. Bast. MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison Wesley, 2003.
20. M. A. Laguna, B. González-Baixauli, O. López, and F. J. García. Introducing systematic reuse in mainstream software. In IEEE Proocedings of EUROMICRO'2003, Antalya, Turkey, 2003.
21. K. Lee, K. C. Kang, W. Chae, and B. W. Choi. Feature-based approach to object-oriented engineering of applications for reuse. Software: Practice and Experience, 30(9):1025-1046, 2000.
22. S. Mellor and M. J. Balcer. Executable UML A foundation for the Model-Driven Architecture. Addison Wesley Professional, 2002.
23. Object-Management-Group. MDA Guide Version 1.0, 2003.
24. Object-Management-Group. Reusable Asset Specification (RAS), ptc/04-06-06, 2004.
25. Object-Management-Group and QVT-Merge-Group. Revised submission for MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformation version 2.0. Object Management Group doc. ad/2005-03-02, 2005.
26. K. Pohl, G. Boeckle, and F. van der Linden. Software Product Line Engineering. Springer, 2005.
27. A. van Lamsweerde. Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In Proceedings of the 5 IEEE Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering, pages 249-262, 2001.
28. T. von der Massen and H. Lichter. Requiline: A requirements engineering tool for software product lines. In Software Product-Family Engineering, PFE 2003, pages 168-180. Siena, Italy, LNCS 3014, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
29. E. S. K. Yu and J. Mylopoulos. From e-r to a-r modelling strategic actor relationships for business process reengineering. Int. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 4(2-3):125-144, 1995.