Experiences with model and autocode reviews in model-based software development

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 45-51

  Stürmer, Ingo ^a   Conrad, Mirko ^b   Fey, Ines ^b   Dörr, Heiko ^b  

^a ACM   (Germany)

^b DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

autocode review; automatic code generation; complexity; model review; model based development; modeling guidelines; simulink; stateflow; testing

Indexed keywords

AUTOCODE REVIEW; AUTOMATIC CODE GENERATION; AUTOMATIC CODE GENERATIONS; COMPLEXITY; MODEL BASED DEVELOPMENT; SIMULINK; STATEFLOW;

AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMING; EMBEDDED SOFTWARE; NETWORK COMPONENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77953496200     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1138474.1138483     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Conrad, M., Dörr, H., Fey, I., Stürmer, I. Using Model and Code Reviews in Model-based Development of ECU Software. SAE Paper 2006-01-1240, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2006 (to appear).
2. Conrad, M., Fey, I., Grochtmann, M., Klein, T. Model-based Development of Embedded Automotive Software at DaimlerChrysler (in german), Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung, Vol. 20, (2005), 3-10.
3. Beine, M., Otterbach, R. and Jungmann, M. Development of Safety-Critical Software Using Automatic Code Generation. SAE Paper 2004-01-0708, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2004
4. dSPACE. TargetLink 1.3p2: Production Code Generator. http://www.dspace. com, 2004.
5. Stürmer, I. Systematic Testing of Code Generation Tools - A Test Suite-oriented Approach for Safeguarding Model-based Code Generation, Pro BUSINESS, Berlin, 2006.
6. Edwards, P.D. The Use of Automatic Code Generation Tools in the Development of Safety-Related Embedded Systems. Vehicle Electronic Systems, Europ. Conference and Exhibition, Jun. 1999.
7. Thomsen, T. Integration of International Standards for Production Code Generation. SAE Paper 2003-01-0855, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2003.
8. Conrad, M., Dörr, H., Fey, I., Pohlheim, H., Stürmer, I. Guidelines and Model Reviews in Model-based Development of ECU Software (in German). 2. Tagung Simulation und Test in der Funktions- und Softwareentwicklung für die Automobilelektronik, Berlin, March, 2005.
9. Stürmer, I. and Conrad, M. A Test Procedure for Optimizing Code Generators (in German), Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung, Vol. 19(4), 2005, pp. 213-223
10. Ranville, S. Practical Application of Model-based Software Design for Automotive. SAE Paper 2002-01-0876, pp. 37-41, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2002
11. Whalen, M. and Heimdahl, M. An Approach for Automatic Code Generation for Safety-Critical Systems. Proc. of 14th IEEE Int. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, Orlando, Oct. 1999, pp. 315-318.
12. DOORS (product information). Telelogic AB, www.telelogic.com/products/ doorsers, 2006.
13. ToolNet (product information). Extessy AG, www.extessy.com, 2006.
14. Gilb, T. and Graham, D., Software Inspections, Addison-Wesley, 1993.
15. Lefarth, U., Baum, U., Beck, T., and Zurawka, T., ASCETSD - Development Environment for Embedded Control Systems, Proc. of IFAC Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design, Gent, April, 1997.
16. The MathWorks Inc (product information), www.mathworks.com/products, 2006.
17. Vitkin, L., Dong, S., Searcy, R., BC M. Effort Estimation in Model-Based Software Development. SAE Paper 2006-01-0309, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2006 (to appear)
18. QA Systems , QA-C (product information), www.qa-systems.de, 2006
19. Walsh, T. J. A Software Reliability Study Using a Complexity Measure, in: McCabe T. J. Structured Testing, New York: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1983, pp. 90-97.
20. nd Int. ICSE workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems (SEAS'05), 2005, pp. 1-6.
21. th European Int. Conf. on Software Testing, Analysis and Review (EuroSTAR '03), Amsterdam, 2003.
22. German, A. Software Static Code Analysis Lessons Learned, CrossTalk, Nov. 2003.