Stakeholders' perceptions of aquaculture and implications for its future: A comparison of the U.S.A. and Norway

Marine Resource Economics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-76

  Chu, Jingjie ^a   Anderson, James L ^b   Asche, Frank ^c   Tudur, Lacey ^d  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^d eDigitalResearchcom   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aquaculture stakeholder; Multinomial logit model; Perception action relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953488632     PISSN: 07381360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5950/0738-1360-25.1.61     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, J.L. 2002. Aquaculture and the Future: Why Fisheries Economists Should Care. Marine Resource Economics 17(2): 133-151
2. -. 2008. Emerging Dominance of Aquaculture: The Future of the Seafood Market and Fisheries Management. Keynote Address, Proceeding of International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade 2008: Achieving a Sustainable Future, July 22-25, Nha Trang, Vietnam. IIFET, Corvallis, OR.
3. Asche, F. 2008. Farming the Sea. Marine Resource Economics 23(4):527-547
4. Asche, F., A.G. Guttormsen, and R. Tveteras. 1999. Environmental Problems, Productivity and Innovations in Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management 3(1): 19-29.
5. Asche, F., K.H. Roll, and R. Tveteras. 2007. Productivity Growth in the Supply ChainAnother Source of Competitiveness for Aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics 22:329-334
6. Budis, J., V. Doto, and, J. Moonan. 2003. Stakeholder Positions Relative to die Aquaculture Industry of the United States. Retrieved August 11, 2009, from 〈http://www.lib. noaa.gov/retiredsites/docaqua/wpiprojects/ stakeholderwpi.htm〉.
7. Chu, J. 2009. Aquaculture Stakeholders' Perceptions, Actions, and Implications for Its Future: A Comparison of the U.S.A. and Norway. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
8. Evan, G., and T. Garling. 1991. Environment, Cognition and Action: The Need for Integration. Environment, Cognition and Action: An Integrated Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. FAO. 2002. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2002. Rome, Italy.
10. -. 2007. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2006. Rome, Italy.
11. -. 2009. FishStat Plus. Rome, Italy.
12. Godbout, J., and É. Bélanger. 2007. Economic Voting and Political Sophistication in the United States: A Reassessment. Political Research Quarterly 60(3):541-554
13. Greene, W. 2002. Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14. Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham. 2005. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
15. Heberlein, TA., M.A. Wilson, R.C. Bishop, and N.C. Schaeffer. 2005. Rethinking The Scope Test as A Criterion for Validity in Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(1): 1-22.
16. Highton, B. 2004. Policy Voting in Senate Elections: The Case of Abortion. Political Behavior 26(2): 181-200. (Pubitemid 39073106)
17. Jain, A.K., M.N. Murty, and P.J. Flynn. 1999. Data Clustering: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys 31(3):264-323.
18. Jin, D., H. Kite-Powell, and P. Hoagland. 2005. Risk Assessment in Open-Ocean Aquaculture: A Firm-Level Investment-Production Model. Aquaculture Economics and Management 9:369-387 (Pubitemid 43072568)
19. Katranidis, S., E. Nitsi, and A. Vakrou. 2003. Social Acceptability of Aquaculture Development in Coastal Areas: The Case of Two Greek Islands. Coastal Management 31:37-53. (Pubitemid 36154711)
20. Knapp, G., C.A. Roheim, and J.L. Anderson. 2007. The Great Salmon Run: Competition Between Wild and Farmed Salmon. Washington: TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fund.
21. Levitt, S., and S. Dubner. 2005. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: Harper Collins.
22. Lockwood, G. 2001. Kill Aquaculture: Part 2. Aquaculture Magazine Nov./Dec.:29-32.
23. Mansur, E., R. Mendelsohn, and W. Morrison. 2008. Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of Fuel Choice and Consumption in The U.S. Energy Sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(2):175-193
24. Marine Aquaculture Task Force. 2007. Sustainable Marine Aquaculture: Fulfilling The Promise, Managing The Risks. Takoma Park, MD.
25. Mazur, N.A., and A.L. Curtis. 2006. Risk Perceptions, Aquaculture, and Issues of Trust: Lessons from Australia. Society and Natural Resources 19(9):791-808.
26. -. 2008. Understanding Community Perceptions of Aquaculture: Lessons from Australia. Aquaculture International 16(6):601-621
27. Mittelhammer, R.C., G.G. Judge, and D. J. Miller. 2000. Econometric Foundations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Nash, C.E. 2004. Achieving Policy Objectives to Increase the Value of the Seafood Industry in The United States: The Technical Feasibility and Associated Constraints. Food Policy 29: 621-641
29. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2009. Fisheries of the United States 2008. Silver Spring, Maryland. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from 〈http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/ st1/fus/fus08/index.html〉.
30. Nguyen, A., and J. Taylor. 2003. Post-High School Choices: New Evidence from A Multinomial Logit Model. Journal of Population Economics 16(s):287-306. (Pubitemid 36776892)
31. Robertson, R., E. Carlsen, and A. Bright. 2002. Effect of Information on Attitudes towards Offshore Marine Finfish Aquaculture Development in Northern New England. Aquaculture Economics and Management 6( 1 &2): 117-126 (Pubitemid 34718744)
32. Tango-Lowy, T., and R.A. Robertson. 2002. Predisposition toward Adoption of Open Ocean Aquaculture by Northern New England's Inshore, Commercial Fishermen. Human Organization 61 (3):240-251 (Pubitemid 35235817)
33. Wirth, F.F., and E.J. Luzar. 2001. Regulatory Climate toward Finfish Aquaculture: The Impacts of State Institutional Structure. Aquaculture Economics and Management 5(1-2):99-114.