General poisson exact breakdown of the mutual information to study the role of correlations in populations of Neurons

Neural Computation

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1445-1467

  Scaglione, A ^a   Moxon, K A ^a   Foffani, G ^a,b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL NACIONAL DE PARAPLÉJICOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; RAT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; RATS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 77953487293     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2010.04-09-989     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Borst, A., & Theunissen, F. E. (1999). Information theory and neural coding. Nat. Neurosci., 2(11), 947-957
2. Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York:Wiley.
3. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Foffani, G.,Chapin, J. K.,&Moxon, K. A. (2008).Computational role of large receptive fields in the primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 100(1), 268-280.
5. Foffani, G., & Moxon, K. A. (2004). PSTH-based classification of sensory stimuli using ensembles of single neurons. J. Neurosci. Methods, 135(1-2), 107-120.
6. Latham, P. E., & Nirenberg, S. (2005). Synergy, redundancy, and independence in population codes, revisited. J. Neurosci., 25(21), 5195-5206.
7. Magri, C., Whittingstall, K., Singh, V., Logothetis, N. K., & Panzeri, S. (2009). A toolbox for the fast information analysis of multiple-site LFP, EEG and spike train recordings. BMC Neuroscience, 10(81).
8. Montemurro, M. A., Senatore, R., & Panzeri, S. (2007). Tight data-robust bounds to mutual information combining shuffling and model selection techniques. Neural Comput., 19(11), 2913-2957.
9. Nirenberg, S.,&Latham, P. E. (2003).Decoding neuronal spike trains:How important are correlations? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100(12), 7348-7353.
10. Panzeri, S., Petersen, R. S., Schultz, S. R., Lebedev, M., & Diamond, M. E. (2001). The role of spike timing in the coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron, 29(3), 769-777.
11. Panzeri, S., & Schultz, S. R. (2001). A unified approach to the study of temporal, correlational, and rate coding. Neural Computation, 13(6), 1311-1349.
12. Panzeri, S., Schultz, S. R., Treves, A., & Rolls, E. T. (1999). Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 266(1423), 1001-1012.
13. Panzeri, S., Senatore, R.,Montemurro,M. A., & Petersen, R. S. (2007). Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. J. Neurophysiol., 98(3), 1064-1072.
14. Petersen, R. S., Panzeri, S., & Diamond, M. E. (2001). Population coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron, 32(3), 503-514.
15. Pola,G., Petersen, R. S., Thiele, A.,Young,M. P.,&Panzeri, S. (2005).Data-robust tight lower bounds to the information carried by spike times of a neuronal population. Neural Computation, 17(9), 1962-2005.
16. Pola, G., Thiele, A., Hoffmann, K. P., & Panzeri, S. (2003). An exact method to quantify the information transmitted by different mechanisms of correlational coding. Network-Computation in Neural Systems, 14(1), 35-60.
17. Quian Quiroga, R., & Panzeri, S. (2009). Extracting information from neuronal populations: Information theory and decoding approaches. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 10(3), 173-185.
18. Rieke, F.,Warland, D., van Steveninck, R. R., & Bialek,W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Scaglione, A., Foffani, G., Scannella, G., Cerutti, S., & Moxon, K. A. (2008). Mutual information expansion for studying the role of correlations in population codes: How important are autocorrelations? Neural Comput., 20(11), 2662-2695.
20. Schneidman, E., Bialek, W., & Berry, M. J., II. (2003). Synergy, redundancy, and independence in population codes. J. Neurosci., 23(37), 11539-11553.
21. Shannon, C. E. (1948).Amathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
22. Tutunculer, B., Foffani, G., Himes, B. T., & Moxon, K. A. (2006). Structure of the excitatory receptive fields of infragranular forelimb neurons in the rat primary somatosensory cortex responding to touch. Cereb. Cortex, 16(6), 791-810.