Timescale-Invariant pattern recognition by feedforward inhibition and parallel signal processing

Neural Computation

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1493-1510

  Creutzig, Felix ^a   Benda, Jan ^b   Wohlgemuth, Sandra ^c   Stumpner, Andreas ^d   Ronacher, Bernhard ^e   Herz, Andreas V M ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GANGLION; HEARING; INSECT; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VOCALIZATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GANGLIA, INVERTEBRATE; INSECTS; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 77953486676     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2010.05-09-1016     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alder, T. B., & Rose, G. J. (1998). Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system. Nat. Neurosci., 1, 519-522.
2. Benda, J. (2002). Single neuron dynamics-Models linking theory and experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
3. Benda, J.,&Herz,A. V.M. (2003). Auniversalmodel for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural Computation, 15, 2523-2564.
4. Blitz, D. M., & Regehr, W.G. (2005). Timing and specificity of feed-forward inhibition within the LGN. Neuron, 45, 917-928.
5. Covey, E., & Casseday, J. H. (1999). Timing in the auditory system of the bat. Annual Review of Physiology, 61, 457-476.
6. Creutzig, F. (2008). Sufficient encoding of dynamical systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universiẗat zu Berlin.
7. Creutzig, F.,Wohlgemuth, S., Stumpner, A., Benda, J., onacher, B., & Herz, A. V.M. (2009). Time-scale invariant representation of acoustic communication signals by a bursting interneuron. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2575-2580.
8. Cruikshank, S. J., Rose,H. J.,&Metherate, R. (2002).Auditory thalamocortical synaptic transmission in vitro. J. Neurophysiol., 87, 361-384.
9. deBoer, E. (1985). Auditory time constants: A paradox? In A. Michelsen (Ed.), Time resolution in auditory systems (pp. 141-158). Berlin: Springer.
10. Elhilali, M., Fritz, J. B., Klein, D. J., Simon, J. Z., & Shamma, S. A. (2004). Dynamics of precise spike timing in primary auditory cortex. J. Neurosci., 24, 1159- 1172.
11. Gerhardt, C. H., & Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Gollisch, T. (2008). Time-warp invariant pattern detection with bursting neurons. New Journal of Physics, 10, 015012.
13. Gollisch, T., & Herz, A. V. M. (2004). Input-driven components of spike-frequency adaptation can be unmasked in vivo. J. Neurosci., 24, 7435-7444.
14. Gollisch, T., &Herz, A. V. M. (2005). Disentangling sub-millisecond processeswithin an auditory transduction chain. PLoS Biol., 3, e8.
15. Hildebrandt, K. J., Benda, J., & Hennig, R. M. (2009). The origin of adaptation in the auditory pathway of locusts is specific to cell type and function. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2626-2636.
16. Hauser, M. D., & Konishi, M. (1999). The design of animal communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Hopfield, J. J. (1996). Transforming neural computations and representing time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93, 15440-15444.
18. Hopfield, J. J., & Brody, C. (2001). What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98, 1282-1297.
19. Izhikevich, E. M. (2004). Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15 (5), 1063-1070.
20. Jin, D. (2004). Spiking neural network for recognizing spatiotemporal sequences of spikes. Phys. Rev. E, 69, 021905.
21. Juang, B. H., & Rabiner, L. R. (1991). HiddenMarkov models for speech recognition. Technometrics, 33, 251-272.
22. Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 59, 1208-1221.
23. Krahe, R., Budinger, E., & Ronacher, B. (2002). Coding of a sexually dimorphic song feature by auditory interneurons of grasshoppers: The role of leading inhibition. J. Comp. Physiology A, 187, 977-985.
24. Luna, R., Hernandez,A., Brody, C. D.,&Romo, R. (2005).Neural codes for perceptual discrimination in primary sensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 8, 1210-1219.
25. Machens, C. K., Schutze, H., Franz, A., Kolesnikova, O., Stemmler, M. B., Ronacher, B., et al. (2003). Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals. Nat. Neurosci., 6, 341-342.
26. Nelken, I. (2004). Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex. Curr. Op. Neurobiol., 14, 474-480.
27. Oestreich, J., Dembrow, N. C., George, A. A., & Zakon, H. H. (2006). A "sample-andhold" pulse-counting integrator as a mechanism for graded memory underlying sensorimotor adaptation. Neuron, 49, 577-588.
28. Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 141-152.
29. Pouille, F., & Scanziani, M. (2001). Enforcement of temporal fidelity in pyramidal cells by somatic feed-forward inhibition. Science, 293, 1159-1163.
30. Rokem, A., Watzl, S., Gollisch, T., Stemmler, M., Herz, A. V. M., & Samengo, I. (2006). Spike-timing precision underlies the coding efficiency of auditory receptor neurons. J. Neurophysiol., 95, 2541-2552.
31. Römer, H. (1976). Die Informationsverarbeitung tympanaler Rezeptorelemente von Locusta migratoria (Acrididae, Orthoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 109, 101-122.
32. Römer, H. (2001). Ecological constraints for sound communication: From grasshoppers to elephants. In F. G. Barth & A. Schmid (Eds.), Ecology of sensing (pp. 59-77). New York: Springer.
33. Ronacher, B., & Stumpner, A. (1988). Filtering of behaviourally relevant temporal parameters of a grasshopper's song by an auditory interneuron. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 163, 517-523.
34. Ronacher, B., von Helversen, D., & von Helversen, O. (1986). Routes and stations in the processing of auditory directional information in the CNS of a grasshopper, as revealed by surgical experiments. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 158, 363-374.
35. Sokoliuk, T. (1992). Neuroanatomische Untersuchungen der Hörbahn von Chorthippus biguttulus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg.
36. Stumpner, A., & Ronacher, B. (1991). Auditory interneurones in the metathoracic ganglion of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. I. Morphological and physiological characterization. J. Exp. Biol., 158, 391-410.
37. Stumpner, A., & Ronacher, B. (1994). Neurophysiological aspects of song pattern recognition and sound localization in grasshoppers. Am. Zool., 34, 696-705.
38. Stumpner, A., Ronacher, B., & von Helversen, O. (1991). Auditory interneurones in the metathoracic ganglion of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. II. Processing of temporal patterns of the song of the male. J. Exp. Biol., 158, 411-430.
39. Tan, A. Y., Zhang, L. I., Merzenich, M. M.,&Schreiner, C. E. (2004). Tone-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances of primary auditory cortex neurons. J. Neurophysiol., 92, 630-643.
40. von Helversen, D. (1972). Gesang des Männchens und Lautschema des Weibchens bei der Feldheuschrecke Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J. Comp. Physiol., 81, 381-422.
41. von Helversen, D., & von Helversen, O. (1997). Recognition of sex in the acoustic communication of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J. Comp. Physiology A, 180, 373-386.
42. von Helversen, O., & von Helversen, D. (1994). Forces driving coevolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. In K. Schildberger & N. Elsner (Eds.), Neural basis of behavioural adaptation (pp. 253-284). Jena: Fischer.
43. Wehr, M., & Zador, A. (2005). Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Neuron, 47, 437-445.