Abdominal pain in pregnancy: Diagnoses and imaging unique to pregnancy - Review

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 194, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2010, Pages

  Woodfield, Courtney A ^a   Lazarus, Elizabeth ^a   Chen, Karen C ^a,b   Mayo Smith, William W ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal pain; CT; MRI; Ultrasound; Women's imaging

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; ULTRASOUND;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77953485609     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.7139     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Firstenberg MS, Malangoni MA. Gastrointestinal surgery during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1998; 27:73-88
2. Mayer IE, Hussain H. Abdominal pain in pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1998; 27:1-36
3. Cappell MS, Friedel D. Abdominal pain during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2003; 32:1-58
4. Sharp HT. The acute abdomen during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 45:405-413
5. Melnick DM, Wahl WL, Dalton VK. Management of general surgical problems in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg 2004; 187:170-180 (Pubitemid 38183429)
6. Oto A, Ernst RD, Shah R, et al. Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 234:445-451 (Pubitemid 40139915)
7. Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM. MR imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006; 238:891-899
8. Birchard KR, Brown MA, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC. MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR 2005; 184:452-458 (Pubitemid 46657250)
9. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al.; ACR Blue Ribbon Panel on MR Safety. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR 2007; 188:1447-1474
10. American College of Radiology Website. ACR practice guideline for imaging pregnant or potentially pregnant adolescents and women with ionizing radiation. www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality-safety/guidelines/ dx/Pregnancy.aspx. Published 2008. Accessed on February 21, 2010
11. Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K, et al. Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 2002; 223:98-105 (Pubitemid 34258195)
12. Lazarus E, Mayo-Smith WW, Mainiero MB, Spencer PK. CT in the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in pregnant women. Radiology 2007; 244:784-790 (Pubitemid 47292089)
13. Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, Subramaniam R, Amorosa JK. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: algorithms and radiation dose considerations. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:1705-1722
14. Rodesch F, Camus M, Ermans AM, Dodion J, Delange F. Adverse effect of amniofetography on fetal thyroid function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126:723-726
15. Atwell TD, Lteif AN, Brown DL, et al. Neonatal thyroid function after administration of IV iodinated contrast agent to 21 pregnant patients. AJR 2008; 191:268-271
16. American College of Radiology Website. Manual on contrast media. www.acr. org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/qualitysafety/contrast-manual.aspx. Published 2008. Accessed February 22, 2010
17. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Conner JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988; 319:189-194
18. Laing FC, Frates MC, Benson CB. Ultrasound evaluation during the first trimester of pregnancy. In: Callen PW, ed. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2008:181-224
19. Rowling SE, Langer JE, Coleman BG, et al. Sonography during early pregnancy: dependence of threshold and discriminatory values on transvaginal transducer frequency. AJR 1999; 172:983-988
20. Levi CS, Lyons EA, Lindsay DJ. Early diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy with endovaginal US. Radiology 1988; 167:383-385
21. Rowling SE, Coleman BG, Langer JE, et al. First-trimester US parameters of failed pregnancy. Radiology 1997; 203:211-217
22. Nyberg DA, Laing FC, Filly RA. Threatened abortion: sonographic distinction of normal and abnormal gestation sacs. Radiology 1986; 158:397-400
23. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Embryonic heart rate in the early first trimester: what rate is normal? J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:431-434
24. Bree RL, Edwards M, Böhm-Veléz M, Beyler S, Roberts J, Mendelson EB. Transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with HCG level. AJR 1989; 153:75
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Current Trends Ectopic Pregnancy: United States, 1990-1992. MMWR 1995; 44:46-48
26. Maymon R, Shulman A. Controversies and problems in the current management of tubal pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2:541-551 (Pubitemid 27153992)
27. Clayton HB, Schieve LA, Peterson HB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:595-604
28. Fernandez H, Gervaise A. Ectopic pregnancies after infertility treatment: modern diagnosis and therapeutic strategy. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10:503-513 (Pubitemid 39529883)
29. Goldman GA, Fisch B, Ovadia J, Tadir Y. Heterotopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1992; 47:217-221
30. Brown DL, Doubilet PM. Transvaginal sonography for diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: positivity criteria and performance characteristics. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:259-266
31. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC. Endovaginal sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective study. AJR 1987; 149:1181-1186
32. Cacciatore B. Can the status of tubal pregnancy be predicted with transvaginal sonography? A prospective comparison of sonographic, surgical, and serum hCG findings. Radiology 1990; 177:481-484 (Pubitemid 20374870)
33. Nyberg DA, Hughes MP, Mack LA, Wang KY. Extrauterine findings of ectopic pregnancy at transvaginal US: importance of echogenic fluid. Radiology 1991; 178:823-826
34. Jung SE, Byun JY, Lee JM, et al. MR imaging of maternal diseases in pregnancy. AJR 2001; 177:1293-1300
35. Nyberg DA, Mach LA, Benedetti TJ, Cyr DR, Schuman WP. Placental abruption and placental hemorrhage: correlation of sonographic findings with fetal outcome. Radiology 1987; 164:357-361
36. Nyberg DA, Cyr DR, Mack LA, Wilson DA, Shuman WP. Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR 1987; 148:161-164
37. Trop I, Levine D. Hemorrhage during pregnancy: sonography and MR imaging. AJR 2001; 176:607-615
38. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:567-572
39. Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16-22 weeks gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:972-978
40. Murakawa H, Utumi T, Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Fuzimori R. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:829-832 (Pubitemid 23312194)
41. Rooholamini SA, Au AH, Hansen GC, et al. Imaging of pregnancy-related complications. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:753-770
42. Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:1098-1103
43. Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1355-1368
44. Eyvazzadeh AD, Levine D. Imaging of pelvic pain in the first trimester of pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am 2006; 44:863-877
45. Chiang G, Levine D. Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:805-819
46. Bromley B, Benaccerraf B. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and outcome. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16:447-452
47. Ribic-Pucelj M, Kobal B, Peternelj-Marinsek S. Surgical treatment of adnexal masses in pregnancy: indications, surgical approach and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med 2007; 52:273-279
48. Smorgick N, Pansky M, Feingold M, et al. The clinical characteristics and sonographic findings of maternal ovarian torsion in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009; 92:1983-1987; Epub Nov. 5, 2008
49. Stark JE, Siegel MJ. Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls: sonographic findings. AJR 1994; 163:1479-1482
50. Rosado WM Jr, Trambert MA, Gosink BB, Pretorius DH. Adnexal torsion: diagnosis by using Doppler sonography. AJR 1992; 159:1251-1253
51. Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG, Arger PH, et al. Leiomyomas in pregnancy: sonographic study. Radiology 1987; 164:375-380
52. Kawakami S, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Red degeneration of uterine leiomyoma: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:925-928 (Pubitemid 24346634)
53. Tamir IL, Bongard FS, Klein SR. Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient. Am J Surg 1990; 160:571-576
54. Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD, et al. Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR 2006; 186:883-887 (Pubitemid 46100282)
55. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 2001; 218:757-762 (Pubitemid 32172559)
56. Jeffrey RB, Jain KA, Nghiem HV. Sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis: interpretive pitfalls. AJR 1994; 162:55-59 (Pubitemid 24043674)
57. Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR 1992; 159:539-542
58. Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR 2001; 176:933-941 (Pubitemid 32240940)
59. Johansson EP, Rydh A, Riklund KA. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Acta Radiol 2007; 48:267-273 (Pubitemid 46589078)
60. Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J. MRI vs ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28:428-433
61. Poortman P, Lohle PN, Schoemaker CM, et al. Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study. AJR 2003; 181:1355-1359
62. Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Mor-Yosef D, et al. Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. AJR 2008; 190:1300-1306
63. Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:1027-1029
64. Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J. MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR 2004; 183:671-675
65. Pedrosa I, Zeikus EA, Levine D, et al. MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant patients and nonpregnant patients. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:721-753
66. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR 2002; 178:1319-1325 (Pubitemid 34547808)
67. Worlicek H, Lutz H, Heyder N, Matek W. Ultrasound findings in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a prospective study. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15:153-163 (Pubitemid 17029132)
68. Haggett PJ, Moore NR, Shearman JD, Travis SP, Jewell DP, Mortensen NJ. Pelvic and perineal complications of Crohn's disease: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging. Gut 1995; 36:407-410
69. Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:689-702
70. Maccioni F, Colaiacomo MC, Parlanti S. Ulcerative colitis: value of MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30:584-592
71. Perdue PW, Johnson HW Jr, Stafford PW. Intestinal obstruction complicating pregnancy. Am J Surg 1992; 164:384-388
72. Davis MR, Bohon CJ. Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1983; 26:832-842
73. Regan F, Beall DP, Bohlman ME, Khazan R, Sufi A, Schaefer DC. Fast MR imaging and the detection of small-bowel obstruction. AJR 1998; 170:1465-1469 (Pubitemid 28237631)
74. Nunes JO, Turner MA, Fulcher AS. Abdominal imaging features of HELLP syndrome: a 10-year retrospective review. AJR 2005; 185:1205-1210
75. Castro MA, Ouzounian JG, Colletti PM, Shaw KJ, Stein SM, Goodwin TM. Radiologic studies in acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a review of the literature and 19 new cases. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:839-843
76. Bzowej NH. Gastrointestinal complications of pregnancy. In: Grendell JH, Friedman SL, McQuaid KR, eds. Current diagnosis & treatment in gastroenterology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2003:183-185
77. Puskar D, Balagovic I, Filipovic A, et al. Symptomatic physiologic hydronephrosis in pregnancy: incidence, complications and treatment. Eur Urol 2001; 39:260-263 (Pubitemid 32245362)
78. Parulkar BG, Hopkins TB, Wollin MR, Howard PJ, Lal A. Renal colic during pregnancy: a case for conservative treatment. J Urol 1998; 159:365-368 (Pubitemid 28049234)
79. Stothers L, Lee LM. Renal colic in pregnancy. J Urol 1992; 148:1383-1387
80. Deyoe LA, Cronan JJ, Breslaw BH, Ridlen MS. New techniques of ultrasound and color Doppler in the prospective evaluation of acute renal obstruction: do they replace the intravenous urogram? Abdom Imaging 1995; 20:58-63
81. Wachsberg RH. Unilateral absence of ureteral jets in the third trimester of pregnancy: pitfall in color Doppler US diagnosis of urinary obstruction. Radiology 1998; 209:279-281
82. Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology 2000; 55:344-347 (Pubitemid 30110581)
83. Fielding JR, Washburn D. Imaging the pregnant patient: a uniform approach. J Women's Imaging 2005; 7:16-21 (Pubitemid 40533269)
84. Spencer JA, Chahal R, Kelly A, Taylor K, Eardley I, Lloyd SN. Evaluation of painful hydronephrosis in pregnancy: magnetic resonance urographic patterns in physiologic dilatation versus calculus obstruction. J Urol 2004; 171:256-260 (Pubitemid 37549137)
85. Greer IA. Thrombosis in pregnancy: maternal and fetal issues. Lancet 1999; 353:1258-1265 (Pubitemid 29168473)
86. Nagayama M, Watanabe Y, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Nakashita S, Dodo Y. Fast MR imaging in obstetrics. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:563-580
87. Renuka T, Dhaliwal LK, Gupta I. Hemorrhage from ruptured utero-ovarian veins during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998; 60:167-168
88. Stanley JC, Fry WJ. Pathogenesis and clinical significance of splenic artery aneurysms. Surgery 1974; 76:898-909
89. Parangi S, Levine D, Henry A, Isakovich N, Pories S. Surgical gastrointestinal disorders during pregnancy. Am J Surg 2007; 193:223-232