Treatment of synthetic kraft evaporator condensate using thermophilic and mesophilic membrane aerated biofilm reactors

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1749-1756

  Liao, B Q ^a   Zheng, M R ^a   Ratana Rueangsri, L ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

COD removal; Kraft evaporator condensate; Membrane aerated biofilm bioreactor; Thermophilic treatment

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND REMOVALS; COD REMOVAL; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; KRAFT EVAPORATOR CONDENSATE; MEMBRANE-AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS; MESOPHILIC; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; THERMOPHILIC TREATMENT;

BATCH REACTORS; BIOFILMS; BIOFILTERS; BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONDENSATE TREATMENT; DENITRIFICATION; EVAPORATORS; OXYGEN; REMOVAL;

STRIPPING (DYES);

AMIDE; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; NITRATE;

BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDENSATE; EVAPORATION; MEMBRANE; NITRIFICATION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; WASTE TREATMENT;

AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOFILM REACTOR; BIOFOULING; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENITRIFICATION; FLOCCULATION; MEMBRANE REACTOR; NITRIFICATION; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TEMPERATURE; THICKNESS; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; AEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; HEAT; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METHODOLOGY; SEWAGE; TIME; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

AEROBIOSIS; BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; HOT TEMPERATURE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; TIME FACTORS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 77953462212     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.114     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF) 2005 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21th edition, Washington, DC.
2. Bérubé, P. R. & Hall, E. R. 2000 Effects of Elevated operating temperatures on methanol removal kinetics from synthetic kraft pulp mill condensate using a membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 34(18), 4359-4367.
3. Blackwell, B. R., Mackay, W. B., Murray, F. E. & Oldham, W. K. 1979 Review of kraft foul condensates. Tappi 62(10), 33-43.
4. Casey, E., Glennon, B. & Hamer, G. 1999 Review of membrane aerated biofilm reactor. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 27, 203-215.
5. Jenkins, D., Richard, M. G. & Daigger, G. T. 2003 Manual on the Cause and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems, 3rd edition. Lewis Publishers, NY, USA.
6. Liao, B. Q. & Liss, S. N. 2007 A comparative study between thermophilic and mesophilic membrance aerated biofilm reactors. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 6, 247-252.
7. Milet, G. M. D. & Duff, S. J. B. 1998 Treatment of kraft condensates in a feedback-controlled sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 38(4-5), 263-271.
8. Norris, P., Marshall, R. & Richard, M. 2000 High temperature effects on activated sludge treatment performance and sludge quality in a recycle mill. Tappi Int. Environ. Conf. Exhib. pp. 383-390.
9. Semmens, M. J., Dahm, K., Shanahan, J. & Christianson, A. 2003 COD and nitrogen removal by biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes. Water. Res. 37, 4343-4350.
10. Welander, T., Morin, R. & Nylėn, B. 1999 Biological removal of methanol from kraft mill condensate. Tappi Proceedings, International Environmental Conference. pp. 783-792.