Spatial variation in zooplankton community structure is related to hydrologic flow units in the missouri river, USA

River Research and Applications

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 605-618

  Dickerson, K D ^a   Medley, K A ^a   Havel, J E ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EMAP; Great rivers ecosystems; NMDS

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RIVER CHANNEL; RIVER FLOW; SPATIAL VARIATION; ZOOPLANKTON;

MISSOURI RIVER; UNITED STATES;

COPEPODA; CRUSTACEA; ROTIFERA;

EID: 77953442457     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akopian M, Garnier J, Pourriot R. 1999. A large reservoir as a source of zooplankton for the river: structure of the populations and influence of fish predation. Journal of Plankton Research 21: 285-297.
2. Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer: Dordrect, The Netherlands 436 p.
3. Angradi TR (ed.). 2006. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, Great River Ecosystems Field Operations Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC; Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.epa.gov/emap/greatriver/.
4. Angradi TR, Bolgrien DW, Jicha TM, Pearson MS, Hill BH, Taylor DL, Schweiger EW, Shepard L, Batterman AR, Moffett MF, Elonen CM, Anderson LE. 2009. A bioassessment approach for mid-continent great rivers: the Upper Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio (USA). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 152: 425-442.
5. Brook AJ,Woodward WB. 1956. Some observations on the effects of water inflow and outflow on the plankton of small lakes. Journal of Animal Ecology 25: 22-35.
6. Brooks JL. 1959. Cladocera. In Freshwater Biology, Edmondson WT (eds). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, NY; 587-656.
7. Clarke KR, Ainsworth M. 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92: 205-219.
8. Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2001. PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd: Plymouth, UK.
9. Cowell BC. 1967. The copepoda and cladocera of a Missouri River reservoir: a comparison of sampling in the reservoir and the discharge. Limnology and Oceanography 12: 125-136.
10. Cowell BC. 1970. The influence of plankton discharges from an upstream reservoir on standing crops in a Missouri River reservoir. Limnology and Oceanography 15: 427-441.
11. Dodson SI. 2005. Introduction to Limnology. McGraw Hill Higher Education: Boston.
12. Dodson SI, Frey DG. 2001. Cladocera and other branchiopoda. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds). Academic Press: San Diego; 850-914.
13. Edmondson WT (eds). 1959. Freshwater Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.
14. Elliott CM, Jacobson RB. 2006. Geomorphic classification and assessment of channel dynamics in the Missouri National Recreational River, South Dakota and Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5313.
15. Galat DL, Berry CR, Gardner WM, Hendrickson JC, Mestl GE, Power GJ, Stone C,Winston MR. 2005a. Spatiotemporal patterns and changes in Missouri River fishes. In Historical Changes in Large River Fish Assemblages of the Americas, Rinne JN, Hughes RM, Calamusso R (eds). American Fisheries Society Symposium 4: Bethesda, MD; 249-291.
16. Galat DL, Berry CR, Peters EJ, White RG. 2005b. Missouri River basin. In Rivers of North America, Benke AC, Cushing CE (eds). Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam; 426-480.
17. Galat DL, Lipkin R. 2000. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 29-48.
18. Havel JE, Medley KA, Dickerson KR, Angradi TR, Bolgrien DW, Bukaveckas PA, Jicha TM. 2009. Effect of main-stem dams on zooplankton communities in the Missouri River (USA). Hydrobiologia 628: 121-135. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9750-8
19. Hynes HBN. 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
20. Jack JD, Thorp JH. 2002. Impacts of fish predation on an Ohio river zooplankton community. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 119-127.
21. Kofoid CA. 1903. The plankton of the Illinois River, 1894-1899, with introductory notes upon the hydrography of the Illinois River and its basin. Part I. Quantitative investigations and general results. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 6: 95-629.
22. Lair N. 2006. A review of regulation mechanisms of metazoan plankton in riverine ecosystems: aquatic habitat versus biota. River Research and Applications 22: 567-593.
23. Pegg MA, Pierce CL. 2002a. Classification of reaches in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone Rivers based on flow characteristics. River Research and Applications 18: 31-42.
24. Pegg MA, Pierce CL. 2002b. Fish community structure in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers in relation to flow characteristics. Hydrobiologia 479: 155-167.
25. Pegg MA, Pierce CL, Roy A. 2003. Hydrological alteration along the Missouri River Basin: a time series approach. Aquatic Sciences 65: 63-72.
26. Pesce GL. 2007. Halicyclops. http://www.luciopesce.net/copepods/halicyc.htm 5/28/2007.
27. Poff NL, Ward JV. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of stream flow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1805-1818.
28. Prepas E. 1978. Sugar-frosted Daphnia: an improved fixation technique for Cladocera. Limnology and Oceanography 23: 557-559.
29. Repsys AJ, Rogers GD. 1982. Zooplankton studies in the channelized Missouri River. In The Middle Missouri River, Hesse L, Hergenrader G, Lewis H, Reetz S, Schlesinger A (eds). The Missouri River Study Group: Norfolk, NE; 125-145.
30. Saunders JF III, Lewis WMJ. 1989. Zooplankton abundance in the lower Orinoco River, Venezuela. Limnology and Oceanography 34: 397-409.
31. Shurin JB, Havel JE, Liebold MA, Pinel-Alloul B. 2000. Local and regional zooplankton species richness: a scale-independent test for saturation. Ecology 81: 3062-3073.
32. Thoms MC, Parsons M. 2002. Eco-geomorphology: an interdisciplinary approach to river science. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 276: 113-119.
33. Thorp JH, Black AR, Haag KH, Wehr JD. 1994. Zooplankton assemblages in the Ohio River: seasonal, tributary, and navigation dam effects. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51: 1634-1643.
34. Wallace RL, Snell TW. 2001. Rotifera. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds). Academic Press: San Diego; 195-254.
35. Ward JV. 1975. Downstream fate of zooplankton from a hypolimnial release mountain reservoir. Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19: 1798-1804.
36. Williamson CE, Reid JW. 2001. Copepoda. In Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds). Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA; 915-954.
37. Wilson MS, Yeatman HC. 1959. Free-living copepoda. In Freshwater Biology, Edmondson WT(ed.). JohnWiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, NY; 735-861.
38. Zurek R, Dumnicka E. 1989. Fate of zooplankton in a river after leaving a dam reservoir. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Beihefie Ergebnisse der Limnologie 33: 549-561.