Clinical evaluation of a rapid, pupil-based assessment of retinal damage associated with glaucoma

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 123-128

  Wride, Nicholas ^a   Habib, Majed ^a   Morris, Keith ^b   Campbell, Steve ^c   Fraser, Scott ^a  

^a SUNDERLAND EYE INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b Applied Neurodiagnostics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Pupillary light reflex; Pupilmetrix; Retina

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PUPIL; PUPIL REFLEX; RETINA; RETINA INJURY; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77953441844     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 1977;14:75-83.
2. Hart WM Jr, Becker B. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(3):268-279.
3. Åsman P, Hejl A. Evaluation of methods for automated hemifield analysis in perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):820-826.
4. Åsman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):812-819.
5. Chen Y, Wyatt HJ, Swanson WH. Pupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry: development and initial testing of a technique. Vision Res. 2005;45(19):2549-2563.
6. Chen Y, Wyatt HJ, Swanson WH, Dul MW. Rapid Pupil-Based Assessment of Glautomatous Damage. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):471-481.
7. Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernandez R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41):41-83.
8. Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernandez R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41):63.
9. Spry PG, Hussin HM, Sparrow JM. Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphery Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(8):1031-1035.
10. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Screening for glaucoma: the time taken by primary examiners to conduct visual field tests in practice. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14(4):351-355.
11. Vernon SA, Ghosh G. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence local practice? Eye. 2001;15:458-463.
12. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Relative effectiveness of different modes of glaucoma screening in optometric practice. Opthalmic Phyisol Opt. 1993;13(3):227-232.