International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system revised: What should be considered critically for gynecologic cancer?

Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 135-136

  Hee, Seung Kim ^a   Yong, Sang Song ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b World Class University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER STAGING; EDITORIAL; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VULVA CANCER;

EID: 77953439050     PISSN: 20050380     EISSN: 20050399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.135     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Odicino F, Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Creasman WT. History of the FIGO cancer Staging system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 101: 205-210
2. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO Staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 103-104
3. Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 104: 177-178
4. Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 107-108
5. Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 109.
6. Hacker NF. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 105-106
7. Petru E, Luck HJ, Stuart G, Gaffney D, Millan D, Vergote I. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) proposals for changes of the current FIGO staging system. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 143: 69-74.