LEAFY blossoms

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 346-352

  Moyroud, Edwige ^a   Kusters, Elske ^b   Monniaux, Marie ^a   Koes, Ronald ^b   Parcy, François ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANGIOSPERM; CELL DIVISION; CYTOLOGY; FLOWER; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; REVIEW;

ANGIOSPERMS; CELL DIVISION; FLOWERS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; PLANT PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

ARABIDOPSIS; BRYOPHYTA; EMBRYOPHYTA; FILICOPHYTA; GYMNOSPERMAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 77953436009     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.03.007     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Benlloch R., et al. Floral initiation and inflorescence architecture: a comparative view. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 100 (2007) 659-676
2. Blazquez M.A., et al. How floral meristems are built. Plant Mol. Biol. 60 (2006) 855-870
3. Liu C., et al. Coming into bloom: the specification of floral meristems. Development 136 (2009) 3379-3391
4. Moyroud E., et al. The LEAFY floral regulators in Angiosperms: conserved proteins with diverse roles. J. Plant Biol. 52 (2009) 177-185
5. Wagner D. Flower morphogenesis: timing is key. Dev. Cell 16 (2009) 621-622
6. Irish V.F. The flowering of Arabidopsis flower development. Plant J. 61 (2010) 1014-1028
7. Schmid M., et al. Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis. Development 130 (2003) 6001-6012
8. William D.A., et al. Genomic identification of direct target genes of LEAFY. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 1775-1780
9. Hamès C., et al. Structural basis for LEAFY floral switch function and similarity with helix-turn-helix proteins. EMBO J. 27 (2008) 2628-2637
10. Liu C., et al. Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev. Cell 16 (2009) 711-722
11. Chae E., et al. An Arabidopsis F-box protein acts as a transcriptional co-factor to regulate floral development. Development 135 (2008) 1235-1245
12. Kodadek T., et al. Keeping transcriptional activators under control. Cell 127 (2006) 261-264
13. Simon R., et al. Fimbriata controls flower development by mediating between meristem and organ identity genes. Cell 78 (1994) 99-107
14. Lippman Z.B., et al. The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades. PLoS Biol. 6 (2008) e288
15. Souer E., et al. Patterning of inflorescences and flowers by the F-Box protein DOUBLE TOP and the LEAFY homolog ABERRANT LEAF AND FLOWER of Petunia. Plant Cell 20 (2008) 2033-2048
16. Zhang S., et al. Proliferating Floral Organs (Pfo), a Lotus japonicus gene required for specifying floral meristem determinacy and organ identity, encodes an F-box protein. Plant J. 33 (2003) 607-619
17. Bomblies K., et al. Duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs zfl1 and zfl2 control inflorescence architecture and flower patterning in maize. Development 130 (2003) 2385-2395
18. Kyozuka J., et al. Down-regulation of RFL, the FLO/LFY homolog of rice, accompanied with panicle branch initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 1979-1982
19. Rao N.N., et al. Distinct regulatory role for RFL, the rice LFY homolog, in determining flowering time and plant architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 3646-3651
20. Ikeda K., et al. Rice ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 1, encoding an F-box protein, regulates meristem fate. Plant J. 51 (2007) 1030-1040
21. Ikeda-Kawakatsu K., et al. Expression level of ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION1 determines rice inflorescence form through control of cell proliferation in the meristem. Plant Physiol. 150 (2009) 736-747
22. Ohmori S., et al. MOSAIC FLORAL ORGANS1, an AGL6-like MADS box gene, regulates floral organ identity and meristem fate in rice. Plant Cell 21 (2009) 3008-3025
23. Becker A., et al. Floral and vegetative morphogenesis in California poppy (Eschscholzia californica Cham.). Int. J. Plant Sci. 166 (2005) 537-555
24. Prenner G., et al. The key role of morphology in modelling inflorescence architecture. Trends Plant Sci. 14 (2009) 302-309
25. Prusinkiewicz P., et al. Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316 (2007) 1452-1456
26. Parcy F. Flowering: a time for integration. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49 (2005) 585-593
27. Bradley D., et al. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275 (1997) 80-83
28. Weigel D., and Nilsson O. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377 (1995) 495-500
29. Kelly A.J., et al. NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems. Plant Cell 7 (1995) 225-234
30. Molinero-Rosales N., et al. FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity. Plant J. 20 (1999) 685-693
31. Souer E., et al. Genetic control of branching pattern and floral identity during Petunia inflorescence development. Development 125 (1998) 733-742
32. Lee I., et al. A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS. Curr. Biol. 7 (1997) 95-104
33. Carroll S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134 (2008) 25-36
34. Hoekstra H.E., and Coyne J.A. The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61 (2007) 995-1016
35. Pennisi E. Evolutionary biology. Deciphering the genetics of evolution. Science 321 (2008) 760-763
36. Stern D.L., and Orgogozo V. The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution?. Evolution 62 (2008) 2155-2177
37. Shu G., et al. LEAFY and the evolution of rosette flowering in violet cress (Jonopsidium acaule, Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87 (2000) 634-641
38. Yoon H.S., and Baum D.A. Transgenic study of parallelism in plant morphological evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 6524-6529
39. Sliwinski M.K., et al. The role of two LEAFY paralogs from Idahoa scapigera (Brassicaceae) in the evolution of a derived plant architecture. Plant J. 51 (2007) 211-219
40. Kanrar S., et al. Regulatory networks that function to specify flower meristems require the function of homeobox genes PENNYWISE and POUND-FOOLISH in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 54 (2008) 924-937
41. Karim M.R., et al. A role for Arabidopsis PUCHI in floral meristem identity and bract suppression. Plant Cell 21 (2009) 1360-1372
42. Lee J., et al. SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY. Plant J. 55 (2008) 832-843
43. Liu C., et al. Direct interaction of AGL24 and SOC1 integrates flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Development 135 (2008) 1481-1491
44. Yamaguchi A., et al. The microRNA-regulated SBP-Box transcription factor SPL3 is a direct upstream activator of LEAFY, FRUITFULL, and APETALA1. Dev. Cell 17 (2009) 268-278
45. Champagne C.E., et al. Compound leaf development and evolution in the legumes. Plant Cell 19 (2007) 3369-3378
46. Hofer J., et al. UNIFOLIATA regulates leaf and flower morphogenesis in pea. Curr. Biol. 7 (1997) 581-587
47. Taylor S., et al. Stamina pistilloida, the pea ortholog of Fim and UFO, is required for normal development of flowers, inflorescences, and leaves. Plant Cell 13 (2001) 31-46
48. Blein T., et al. A conserved molecular framework for compound leaf development. Science 322 (2008) 1835-1839
49. Mouradov A., et al. NEEDLY, a Pinus radiata ortholog of FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes, expressed in both reproductive and vegetative meristems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 6537-6542
50. Frohlich M.W., and Parker D.S. The mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins: from genes to fossils. Syst. Bot. 25 (2000) 155-170
51. Carlsbecker A., et al. The MADS-box gene DAL1 is a potential mediator of the juvenile-to-adult transition in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Plant J. 40 (2004) 546-557
52. Dornelas M.C., and Rodriguez A.P. A Floricaula/Leafy gene homolog is preferentially expressed in developing female cones of the tropical pine Pinus caribaea var. caribaea. Genet. Mol. Biol. 28 (2005) 299-307
53. Guo C.L., et al. Expressions of LEAFY homologous genes in different organs and stages of Ginkgo biloba. Yi Chuan 27 (2005) 241-244
54. Mellerowicz E.J., et al. PRFLL - a Pinus radiata homologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY is expressed in buds containing vegetative shoot and undifferentiated male cone primordia. Planta 206 (1998) 619-629
55. Shindo S., et al. Characterization of a FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologue of Gnetum parvifolium and its implications for the evolution of reproductive organs in seed plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162 (2001) 1199-1209
56. Shiokawa T., et al. Isolation and functional analysis of the CjNdly gene, a homolog in Cryptomeria japonica of FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes. Tree Physiol. 28 (2008) 21-28
57. Vazquez-Lobo A., et al. Characterization of the expression patterns of LEAFY/FLORICAULA and NEEDLY orthologs in female and male cones of the conifer genera Picea, Podocarpus, and Taxus: implications for current evo-devo hypotheses for gymnosperms. Evol. Dev. 9 (2007) 446-459
58. Zahn L.M., et al. The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of MADS-box genes: a preangiosperm origin with multiple duplications throughout angiosperm history. Genetics 169 (2005) 2209-2223
59. Rijpkema A.S., et al. The petunia AGL6 gene has a SEPALLATA-like function in floral patterning. Plant J. 60 (2009) 1-9
60. Theissen G., and Becker A. Gymnosperms orthologs of class B floral homeotic genes and their impact on understanding flower origin. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23 (2004) 129-148
61. Sundstrom J., and Engstrom P. Conifer reproductive development involves B-type MADS-box genes with distinct and different activities in male organ primordia. Plant J. 31 (2002) 161-169
62. Maizel A., et al. The floral regulator LEAFY evolves by substitutions in the DNA binding domain. Science 308 (2005) 260-263
63. Frohlich M.W. An evolutionary scenario for the origin of flowers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 559-566
64. Himi S., et al. Evolution of MADS-box gene induction by FLO/LFY genes. J. Mol. Evol. 53 (2001) 387-393
65. Tanahashi T., et al. Diversification of gene function: homologs of the floral regulator FLO/LFY control the first zygotic cell division in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Development 132 (2005) 1727-1736
66. Münster T., et al. Evolutionary aspects of MADS-box genes in the eusporangiate fern Ophioglossum. Plant Biol. 4 (2002) 474-483
67. Singer S.D., et al. Clues about the ancestral roles of plant MADS-box genes from a functional analysis of moss homologues. Plant Cell Rep. 26 (2007) 1155-1169
68. Tanabe Y., et al. Characterization of the Selaginella remotifolia MADS-box gene. J. Plant Res. 116 (2003) 71-75
69. Rudall P.J., et al. Nonflowers near the base of extant angiosperms? Spatiotemporal arrangement of organs in reproductive units of Hydatellaceae and its bearing on the origin of the flower. Am. J. Bot. 96 (2009) 67-82
70. Smyth D.R., et al. Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2 (1990) 755-767
71. Krizek B.A., and Fletcher J.C. Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 (2005) 688-698
72. Kyozuka J., et al. Spatially and temporally regulated expression of rice MADS box genes with similarity to Arabidopsis class A, B and C genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 41 (2000) 710-718
73. Yamaguchi T., and Hirano H.Y. Function and diversification of MADS-box genes in rice. Scientific World J. 6 (2006) 1923-1932
74. Yamaguchi T., et al. Functional diversification of the two C-class MADS box genes OSMADS3 and OSMADS58 in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 18 (2006) 15-28