The institutional analysis and development framework and the commons

Cornell Law Review

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 807-815

  Ostrom, Elinor ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953411109     PISSN: 00108847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. See Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom eds., 2007) [hereinafter Understanding Knowledge].
2. See, e.g., Charlotte Hess & Elinor Ostrom, Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons, in Understanding Knowledge, supra note 1, at 3-4, 13-20.
3. See generally Elinor Ostrom, Roger B. Parks & Gordon P. Whitaker, Patterns of Metropolitan Policing (1978) (presenting an overview of the organization of police services in metropolitan America) [hereinafter Metropolitan Policing];
4. Elinor Ostrom & Roger B. Parks, Neither Gargantua nor the Land of Lilliputs: Conjectures on Mixed Systems of Metropolitan Organization, in Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis 284 (Michael D. McGinnis ed., 1999) [hereinafter PoLYCENTRicrry] (arguing that complex solutions to the complex problems inherent in urban police organizations are likely more effective than the simple solutions advocated by many social scientists)
5. Elinor Ostrom, Roger B. Parks & Gordon P. Whitaker, Do We Really Want to Consolidate Urban Police Forces ? A Reappraisal of Some Old Assertions, 33 Pub. Admin. Rev. 423 (1973) (presenting data and analysis showing that aggregating police services may not always be preferable to decentralizing such services).
6. See, e.g., Amos H. Hawley & Basil G. Zimmer, The Metropolitan Community: Its People and Government 3 (1970) ("Given the diagnosis the treatment seems just as apparent' consolidate the many political units under a single, over-arching municipal government.").
7. See Basil G. Zimmer & Amos H. Hawley, Metropolitan Area Schools: Resistance to District Reorganization 27-29 (1968)
8. David L. Kirp & David K. Cohen, Education and Metropolitanism, in Metropoutanization and Public Services 29, 29-30 (Lowdon Wingo ed., 1972).
9. See, e.g., President's Comm'n on Law Enforcement and Admin, of Justice, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society 119-123 (1967).
10. See Metropolitan Poucing, supra note 3, at 7-22;
11. see also James C. McDavid, Interjurisdictional Cooperation Among Police Departments in the St. Louis Metropolitan Area, 4 Pub-uus 35, 41-58 (1974);
12. Elinor Ostrom & Gordon P. Whitaker, Community Control and Governmental Responsiveness: The Case of Police in Black Neighborhoods, in Improving the Quality of Urban Management 303, 317-334 (Willis D. Hawley & David Rogers eds., 1974).
13. See Metropolitan Poucing, supra note 3, at xxxi-xxxv.
14. See Elinor Ostrom, Roger B. Parks & Gordon P. Whitaker, Policing: Is There a System?, in 5 Sage Yearbooks in Politics & Public Policy: The Policy Cycle 111, 124-143 (Judith V. May & Aaron B. Wildavsky eds., 1978).
15. See Vincent Ostrom & Elinor Ostrom, Legal and Political Conditions of Water Resource Development, 48 Land Econ. 1, 5-8 (1972).
16. See Ronald Oakerson, Erosion of Public Goods: The Case of Coal-Haul Roads in Eastern Kentucky, 2 Res. in Pub. Pol'y Analysis & Mgmt. 73-102 (1981).
17. See Vincent Ostrom, Polycentricity (Part 1), in Polycentricity, supra note 3, at 52, 69-73
18. Vincent Ostrom, Polycentricity (Part 2), in Polycentricity, supra note 3, at 119, 126-132
19. See Larry L, Riser & Elinor Ostrom, The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches, in Strategies of Political Inquiry 179 (Elinor Ostrom ed., 1982).
20. See id. at 190-95;
21. see also Avner Greif, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade 3-28 (2006) (discussing the evolution and contested nature of institutional analysis in economics and political science).
22. See Greif, supra note 14.
23. See Michael J. Madison, Brett M. Frischmann & Katherine J. Strandburg, Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 657, 661 (2010).
24. See Paul B. de Laat, Governance of Open Source Software: State of the Art, 11 J. Mgmt. & Governance 165, 166-172 (2007).
25. See M. Lynne Markus, The Governance of Free/Open Source Software Projects: Monolithic, Multidimensional, or Configurational?, 11 J. Mgmt. & Governance 151, 154-158 (2007).
26. See Siobhán O'Mahony, The Governance of Open Source Initiatives: What Does It Mean to Be Community Managed?, 11 J. Mgmt. & Governance 139, 144-148 (2007).
27. See Vincent Ostrom, Artisanship and Artifact, 40 Pub. Admin. Rev. 309, 312-314 (1980).
28. See Riser & Ostrom, supra note 13, at 184-205.
29. See Elinor Ostrom, An Agenda for the Study of Institutions, 48 Pub. Choice 3, 17 (1986).
30. See, e.g., id.
31. See, e.g., Vincent Ostrom & Elinor Ostrom, Public Goods and Public Choices, in Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance 7, 9-18 (E.S. Savas ed., 1977).
32. See Ostrom & Ostrom, supra note 10, at 6-9.
33. See Metropolitan Policing, supra note 3, at xxix.
34. See Ostrom, supra note 22, at 19.
35. See Markus, supra note 18, at 155-160
36. See Madison, Frischmann & Strandburg, supra note 16, at 681.
37. Id.
38. Id.
39. See Constance Holden, Paper Retracted Following Genome Data Breach, 325 Science 1486 (2009).
40. See id.
41. Id.
42. Id. at 1487.
43. id.
44. Id.
45. Id. (alteration in original).
46. See Charles M. Schweik, An Institutional Analysis Approach to Studying Libre Software 'Commons', 6 Upgrade: The Eur. J. for the Informatics Prof. 17, 17, 19-20 (2005)
47. Charles M. Schweik & Robert English, Tragedy of the FOSS Commons? Investigating the Institutional Designs of Free/Libre and Open Source Software Projects, 12 First Monday 2 (2007), http:/ /firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1619/1534.
48. See Markus, supra note 18, at 155-156
49. See O'Mahony, supra note 19, at 144-148
50. See Schweik & English, supra note 39 ("[A]s of April 2005, more than 90 percent of the projects listed on Sourceforge.net still involve less than five developers.").
51. See Email from Charles M. Schweik, Associate Professor, Univ. Mass. Amherst, to author (Oct 7, 2009) (on file with author).
52. See Michael P. Hamel & Charles M. Schweik, Open Source Collaboration: Two Cases in the U.S. Public Sector, 14 First Monday 1 (2009), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2313/ 2065.
53. See Charles M. Schweik et al., Factors Leading to Success or Abandonment of Open Source Commons: An Empirical Analysis of Sourceforge.net Projects, 2008 Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G) Conf. 108, 111, available at http://www.osgeo.org/ocs/index.php/foss4g/2008/paper/viewFile/135/55.
54. See id. at 115.