Response to open peer commentaries on "The case for evidence-based rule making"

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Sachs, Benjamin ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CODES OF ETHICS; ETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 77953389362     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.483185     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Borgerson, K., and J. Millum. 2010. A third way: Ethics guidance as evidence-informed provisional rules. American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 20-22.
2. Evans, E. L. 2010. In defense of valid design as a policy rule. American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 18-19.
3. Gerson, J., and S. N. Goodman. 2010. An absence of evidence in 'evidence-based rulemaking.' American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 22-23.
4. Hunter, D. 2010. Is there a case for a distinction between ethics and policy? American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 24-25.
5. Kon, A. A. 2010. Ethical rules for human subjects research: A case where the 'is' must inform the 'ought.' American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 14-15.
6. Resnik, D. B. 2010. Public trust as a policy goal for research with human subjects. American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 15-17.
7. Sachs, B. 2010. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research. American Journal of Bioethics 10(6):3-13.
8. Sachs, B. In press. Going from principles to rules in research ethics. Bioethics. Early view available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122525565/pdfstart