메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 252-255

Systematic review articles concerning treatment and prevention - An introduction to questions and answers. Part 2 - What defines a good review article?;Systematische übersichtsarbeiten zu fragen der therapie und prävention - Eine einführung in frage und antwort. Teil 2 - Was macht eine gute übersichtsarbeit aus?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZATION; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 77953377081     PISSN: 07236913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey
Times cited : (5)

References (2)
  • 1
    • 0029914622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
    • Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12.
    • (1996) Control Clin Trials , vol.17 , pp. 1-12
    • Jadad, A.R.1    Moore, R.A.2    Carroll, D.3    Jenkinson, C.4
  • 2
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-900.
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.