Analyses of the effect of seismic behavior of shallow tunnels in liquefiable grounds

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 543-552

  Azadi, M ^a   Mir Mohammad Hosseini, S M ^b  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Liquefaction; Numerical analysis; Seismic behavior; Shallow tunnel

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE LOADINGS; LARGE STRAINS; LIQUEFIABLE GROUND; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; SEISMIC LOADINGS; SHALLOW TUNNEL; SHIELD TUNNEL; SMALL STRAINS;

LIQUEFACTION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES;

LIQUEFACTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRAIN; TUNNEL; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 77953363517     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chou H., Yang C., Hsieh B., Chang S. A study of liquefaction related damages on shield tunnels. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 2001, 16(1):185-193.
2. Cundall, et al., 2001. Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua Manual. Online Manual.
3. Hall, W.J., O'Rourke, T.D., 1991. Seismic behavior and vulnerability of pipelines. In: Proc. 3 US Conf. Lifeline Earthquake, pp. 761-773.
4. Hamada M., Isoyama R., Wakamatsu K. Liquefaction induced ground displacement and its related damage to lifeline facilities. Soils Foundations 1996, 36(1):81-97.
5. Hashash Y.M.A., Tseng W.S., Krimotat A. Seismic soil-structure interaction analysis for immersed tube tunnels retrofit. ASCE 1998, 2:1380-1391. (Geotechnical special publication).
6. Hashash Y., Hook J., Schmidt B., Chiang Yao J. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 2001, 16:247-293.
7. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1993. Reconnaissance Report on the July 16, 1990 Luzon Earthquake, the Philippines (in Japanese).
8. Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1986. Tohoku Branch. Report on the Damage Investigation of the 1983 Nihonkai-Chubu Earthquake (in Japanese).
9. John C.M., Zahra T.F. A seismic design of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1987, 12:165-197.
10. Khoshnoudian Numerical analysis of the seismic behavior of tunnels constructed in liquefiable soils. Soils and Foundations 2002, 42(6):1-8.
11. Koseki J., Matsuo O., Koga Y. Uplift behavior of underground structures caused by liquefaction of surrounding soil during earthquake. Soils Foundations 1997, 37:97-108.
12. Koseki J., Matsuo O., Ninomiya Y., Yoshida T. Uplift of Sewer manholes during the 1993 Kushiro-oki earthquake. Soil Foundations 1997, 37:109-121.
13. Ling H.I., Mohri Y., Kawabati T., Liu H., Burke C., Sun L. Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 2003, 129:1092-1101.
14. Liu H., Song E. Seismic response of large underground structures in liquefiable soils subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations. Computers and Geotechnics 2005, 32(4):223-244.
15. Matsumoto J. Sanitary facilities. General Report on the Niigata Earthquake of 1964 1968, Tokyo Electrical Engineering College Press. Kawasumi (Ed.).
16. Ohshima Y., Watanabe H. Elasto-plastic dynamic response analysis of underground structure-soil composite based upon the 3-D finite element method. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering 1994, 11:1035-1145.
17. Orense R.P., Morimoto I., Yamamoto Y., Yumiyama T., Yamamoto H., Sugawara K. Study on wall-type gravel drains as liquefaction countermeasure for underground structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2003, 23:19-39.
18. O'Rourke, T.D., Gowdy, T.E., Stewart, H.E., Pease, J.W., 1991. Lifeline and geotechnical aspects of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. In: Proc. 2th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamic. Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, pp. 1601-1612.
19. O'Rourke, T.D., Goh, S.H., Menkiti, C.O., Mair, R.J., 2001. Highway tunnel performance during the 1999 Duzce earthquake. In: Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Geotech. Eng.
20. Pashangpishe, Y., 2004. Mechanism of Soil Deformation Due to Double Lenses Liquefaction and Critical Depth Determination. Msc thesis Submitted in Civil Eng. Faculty of Amirkabir Univ. of Technology, Iran.
21. Schmidt B., Hashash Y.S.T. US immersed tube retrofit. Tunnels and Tunnelling International 1998, 30:22-24.
22. Stamos A.A., Beskos D.E. Dynamic analysis of large 3-D underground structures by BEM. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995, 24:917-934.
23. Wang J.M. Distribution of earthquake damage to underground facilities during the 1976 Tang-shan earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 1985, 1:741-757.
24. Wang L.R.L., Shim J.S., Ishibashi I., Wang Y. Dynamic responses of buried pipelines during a liquefaction process. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1990, 9:44-50.
25. Wang W.L., Wang T.T., Su J.J., Seng C.H., Huang T.H. Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Underground Space Technology 2001, 16:133-150.