Efficiency of financial transmission rights markets in centrally coordinated periodic auctions

Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 771-778

  Adamson, Seabron ^a   Noe, Thomas ^b   Parker, Geoffrey ^b  

^a University of Oxford ^*

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electricity markets; Energy markets; Financial transmission rights; Learning; Locational marginal price

Indexed keywords

CONGESTION PRICE; ELECTRICITY MARKET; ELECTRICITY MARKET DESIGN; ENERGY MARKETS; FINANCIAL TRANSMISSION RIGHT; FORWARD PRICE; INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS; LMP MARKETS; LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICES; LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICING; MARKET PARTICIPANTS; NEW YORK; PANEL DATA; SUB-REGIONS; TRANSMISSION PRICE;

COSTS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES;

COMMERCE;

ELECTRICITY; ENERGY MARKET; LEARNING; MARKET CONDITIONS; PANEL DATA; PRICE DETERMINATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953363342     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adamson S., Englander S. Efficiency of New York Transmission Congestion Contract Auctions. Proceedings, Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS-38 2005.
2. Argote L. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
3. Bessembinder H. Systematic risk, hedging pressure, and risk premiums in futures markets. The Review of Financial Studies 1992, 5(4):637-667.
4. Corrado C.J., Su T. Skewness and kurtosis in S&P 500 index returns implied by option prices. Journal of Financial Research 1996, 19:175-192.
5. CRA International Update on the ERCOT Nodal Market Cost-Benefit Analysis. Report Prepared for the Public Utility Commission of Texas 2008, Available at http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/reports/31600/PUCT_CBA_Report_Final.pdf.
6. Deng S.J., Oren S., Meliopoulos S. The Inherent Inefficiency of the Point-to-Point Congestion Revenue Right Auction. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences 2004, 1-6. Archived by IEEE, Hawaii, U.S.A.
7. DeVany A.S., Wall W.D. Co-integration analysis of spot electricity prices: insights on transmission efficiency in the western U.S. Energy Economics 1999, 21(5):435-448.
8. Duthaler C., Finger M. Evolution of Transmission Rights in the European Electricity Market Working Paper 2009.
9. Engel C. The forward discount anomaly and the risk premium: a survey of recent evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance 1996, 3:123-192.
10. Hadsell L., Shawky H. Efficiency and profit in the NYISO transmission congestion contract market. The Electricity Journal 2009, 22(9):47-57.
11. Hogan W. Contract networks for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics 1992, 4(3):211-242.
12. Huber P. Robust estimation of a location parameter. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1964, 35:73-101.
13. Keynes J.M. A Treatise on Money 1930, Vol. II. Macmillan, London.
14. Neuhoff K. Coupling Transmission and Energy Markets Reduces Market Power. Working paper, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge 2004.
15. New York ISO Transmission and Dispatching Operation Manual 2008, (Available from www.nyiso.com).
16. Rietz T.A. The equity risk premium: a solution. Journal of Monetary Economics 1988, 22(1):117-131.
17. Schweppe F., Caramanis M.C., Tabors R.D., Bohn R.E. Spot Pricing of Electricity 1988, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
18. Siddiqui A.S., Bartholomew E.S., Marnay C., Oren S.S. On the efficiency of the New York independent system operator market for transmission congestion contracts. Journal of Managerial Finance 2005, 31(1):1-45.
19. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48(4):817-838.
20. Wright T.P. Learning curve. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 1936, 3(2):122-128.