Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 181-190

  Coeckelbergh, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AI; Assistive technology; Capabilities; Good life ethics; Health care; Robots

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953362992     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-009-9186-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anand P (2005) Capabilities and health. J Med Ethics 31: 299-303.
2. Beauchamp T, Childress IF (1994) Principles in biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Coeckelbergh M (2007) Imagination and principles. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke/New York.
4. Decker M (2008) Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI & Soc 22(3): 315-330.
5. Kass L (1985) The end of medicine and the pursuit of health. In: Kass L (ed) Toward a more natural science. The Free Press, New York, pp 157-186.
6. Nishio S, Ighiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Can a teleoperated android represent personal experience? a case study with children. Psychologia 50(4): 330-342.
7. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New York.
8. Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Nussbaum MC (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge M. A. and London.
10. Nussbaum MC, Sen A (eds) (1993) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
11. Ruger JP (2006) Health, capability, and justice: toward a new paradigm of health ethics, policy and law. Cornell J Law Public Policy 15(2): 403-482.
12. Sparrow R (2002) The march of the robot dogs. Ethics Inf Technol 4: 305-318.
13. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind Mach 16(2): 141-161.