Venturing into unknown territory: Using aesthetic representations to understand reading comprehension

International Journal of Education and the Arts

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-23

  Cuero, Kimberley K ^a   Bonner, Jennifer ^a   Smith, Brittaney ^a   Schwartz, Michelle ^a   Touchstone, Rose ^a   Vela, Yvonne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953358761     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15298094     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L. L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and meaning making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Calderwood, P. E. (2005). Risking aesthetic reading. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 6(3), 1-11. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from http://ijea.org/v6n3/index.html
3. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
4. Dray, B. J. (2005). A collaborative inquiry with white women about our understanding of difference in education. University of Texas at Austin: UMI/Dissertation Abstracts.
5. Efland, A. D. (2004). Art education as imaginative cognition. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 751-773). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Eisner, E. W. (1987). The role of discipline-based art: The arts and the mission of education. Art Education, 40(5), 6-26,43-45.
7. Eisner, E. W. (1997). Cognition and representation: A way to pursue the American dream? Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 349-353.
8. Goldstein, L. S. (2002, Spring). Curriculum theory. EDC 383: The University of Texas at Austin.
9. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. González, N., Moll, L. C., Tenery, M. F., Rivera, A., Rendon, P., Gonzales, R., et al. (1997). Funds of knowledge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Education, 29(4), 443-470.
11. Group_for_Collaborative_Inquiry, & thINQ. (1994). Collaborative inquiry for the public arena. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 63, 57-68.
12. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1988).Writing and reading: The transactional theory (TR.13). National Center for the Study of Writing, National Writing Project. Retrieved on January 29, 2008, from . http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/599.
15. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Continuing the conversation: A clarification. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(3), 349-354.
16. Serafini, F. (2001). Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384-393.
17. Short, K. G., Kauffman, G., & Kahn, L. H. (2000). "I just need to draw": Responding to literature across multiple sign systems. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 160-171.
18. Stockinger, P. C. (2007). Living in, learning from, looking back, breaking through in the English language arts methods course: A case study of two preservice teachers. English Education, 39(3), 201-225.
19. Vélez-Ibáñez, C., & Greenberg, C. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S. Mexican households. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23(4), 313-335.