Dynamic priority re-allocation scheme for quality of service in IEEE 802.11e wireless networks

Wireless Networks

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 759-774

  Li, Ming ^a   Zhu, Hua ^b   Prabhakaran, B ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b San Diego Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

IEEE 802.11e; Quality of service; Wireless network

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE STATIONS; DYNAMIC PRIORITY; ENHANCED DISTRIBUTED CHANNEL ACCESS; EXTENDED MODEL; EXTENDED PERFORMANCE; HIGH LOAD; IEEE 802.11E; LOW PRIORITIES; MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS; QOS GUARANTEE; QUALITY OF SERVICE PARAMETERS; REALTIME FLOWS; SERVICE DIFFERENTIATION; TRAFFIC CATEGORIES; TRAFFIC LOADS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF SERVICE; STANDARDS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

WIRELESS NETWORKS;

EID: 77953358446     PISSN: 10220038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-009-0167-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Romdhani, L., Ni, Q., & Turletti, T. (2003). Adaptive EDCF: enhanced service differentiation for IEEE 802.11 wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC'03) (Vol. 2, pp. 1373-1378), New Orleans.
2. Zhao, J., Zhang, Q., Zhu, W., & Zhang, Y.-Q. (2002). Throughput and QoS optimization in IEEE 802.11 LAN. In International conference on third generation wireless and beyond, San Francisco.
3. IEEE.802.11e-2005, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, November 11, 2005 from http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/detail?product-id= 1246885.
4. Lindgren, A., Almquist, A., & Schelén, O. (2001). Evaluation of quality of service schemes for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. In Proceedings of the 26th annual IEEE conference on local computer networks (pp. 348-351), Tampa. (Pubitemid 33148884)
5. Aad, I., Ni, Q., Castelluccia, C., & Turletti, T. (2002). Enhancing IEEE 802.11 performance with slow CW decrease. IEEE 802.11e working group document 802.11-02/674r0.
6. Chen, W. T., Lin, Y., & Lo, S. (2002). Priority-based contention control in IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. In 16th international workshop on communications quality & reliability (CQR), Okinawa, Japan.
7. Vaidya, N. H., Bahl, P., & Gupta, S. (2000). Distributed fair scheduling in wireless LAN. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM (pp. 167-178), Boston.
8. Benveniste, M. (2002). Tiered contention multiple access (TCMA), a QOS-based distributed MAC protocol. In The 13th IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (Vol. 2, pp. 598-604), Lisboa, Portugal.
9. Aad, I., & Castelluccia, C. (2002). Remarks on per-flow differentiation in IEEE 802.11. In European wireless 2002, Florance, Italy.
10. Kanodia, V., Li, C., Sabharwal, A., Sadeghi, B., & Knightly, E. (2002). Distributed priority scheduling and medium access in ad hoc networks. ACM Wireless Networks Journal, 8, 455-466.
11. Yang, X., & Vaidya, N. H. (2002). Priority scheduling in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc).
12. Zhu, H., & Chlamtac, I. (2003). An analytical model for IEEE 802.11e EDCF differential services. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN), Dallas.
13. Li, M., Prabhakaran, B., & Sathyamurthy, S. (2003, September). On flow reservation and admission control for distributed scheduling strategies in IEEE802.11 wireless LAN. In Proceeding of the sixth ACM international workshop on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (MSWiM) (pp. 108-115), San Diego.