Preparation and characterization of famotidine microcapsule employing mucoadhesive polymers in combination to enhance gastro retention for oral delivery

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn , Issue 2, 2009, Pages 112-120

  Nayak, Bhabani S ^a   Ghosh, Sunil K ^a   Patro, K Tripati B ^b  

^a Faculty of Pharmacy   (India)

^b Department of Pharmaceutics   (India)

Author keywords

Famotidine; Microencapsulation; Mucoadhesion

Indexed keywords

CARBOPOL 934; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; FAMOTIDINE; GUAR GUM; HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE; METHYLCELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RETENTION; MICROCAPSULE; MOISTURE; MUCOADHESION; PARTICLE SIZE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUSTAINED RELEASE FORMULATION;

EID: 77953344542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09751491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chien YW. Novel drug delivery system. 2nd edn., New York: Marcel Dekker; 2005. p. 249-67.
2. Kirtikar KR, Basu BD. Indian medicinal plants. B.L.M. 3rd edn., Allahabad: Basu Publications; 1991. p. 65-7.
3. Healther DL, Grant SM, Goa KL. Famotidine: an update review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied disease. Drugs 1989;38 :551-90.
4. Dandagi PM, Manvi FV, Gadad AP, Mastiholimath VS, Patil MB, Balamuralidhara V. Microencapsulation of verpamil hydrochloride by ionotropic gelation technique. Indian J Pharm Sci 2004;66(5) :631-35.
5. Shabaraya AR, Narayanacharyulu R. Design and evaluation of chitosan microspheres of metoprolol tartrate for sustained release. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2003;65(3) :250-52.
6. Marshall K, Lachman L, Liberman HA, Kanig JL. Eds., In; The Theory and Practice of industrial Pharmacy, 3rd edn., Mumbai: Varghese publishing house; 1987. p. 171-96.
7. Levis SR, Deasy P. Pharmaceutical applications of size reduced grades of surfactant co-processed micro crystalline cellulose, Int J Pharm 2001;230 :25-33.
8. Desai KG, Park HJ. Study of gamma-irradiation effects on chitosan microparticles. Drug delivery 2006;13 :39-50.
9. Abu-Izza K, Garcia LC, Robert D. Preparation and evaluation of zidovudine loaded sustain release microspheres: optimization of multiple response variables. J Pharm Sci 1996;85(6) : 572-74.
10. Kulkarni GT, Gowthamarajan K, Suresh B., Stability testing of pharmaceutical products: an overview. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2004;38(11) :194-202.
11. Chowdary KPR, Madhvi BLR. A comparative Evaluation of Olibanum Resin, Ethyl cellulose and Ethylene vinyl acetate coated Microcapsules of Indomethacin for controlled release. The Pharma Review Aug. 2006 :137-40.
12. Mishra B, Rai AS, Sankar C. Evaluation of solid dispersions and microcapsules of Nimesulide. The Indian Pharmacist 2005;4(35) :54-7.
13. Bhumkar DR, Maheshwari M, Patil VB, Pokharkar VB. Studies on effect of variabilities by response surface methodology for naproxane microspheres. Indian Drugs 2003;40(8) :455-61.
14. Reithmeier H, Herrmann J, Gopferich A. Lipid microparticles as a parenteral controlled release device for peptides, J Control Release 2001;73(2-3) :339-50.
15. Morkhade DM, Fulzele SV, Satturwar PM, Joshi SB. Gum copal and gum dammar: novel matrix forming material for sustained drug delivery. Indian J Pharm Sci 2006;68(1) :53-58.
16. Higuchi T. Mechanism of rate of sustained-action medication. J Pharm Sci 1963;52(11) :1145-49.
17. Grattarda N, Perninb M, Martyb B, Roudauta G, Champion D. Study of release kinetics of small and high molecular weight substances dispersed into spray-dried ethylcellulose microspheres, J Control Release 2002;84 :125-35.
18. Chowdary KPR, Rao YS. Mucoadhesive microcapsules of glipizide: characterization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Indian J Pharm Sci 2003;65(3) :279-84.
19. Bolton S., Analysis of variance. In: Pharmaceutical statistics-practical and clinical application. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 235-69.