Is it possible to predict the lower uterine segment thickness by sonographic examination in cases with previous abdominal delivery?;Alt segment kalinliǧi eski sezaryenli olgularda ultrasonografi ile tespit edilebilir mi?

Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 161-164

  Dane, Banu ^a   Dane, Cem ^a   Gültekin, Esra ^a   Çetin, Ahmet ^a   Yayla, Murat ^a  

^a HASEKI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Ultrasonography; Uterine rupture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MYOMETRIUM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 77953342416     PISSN: 13000306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cengiz B. [Indications of cesarean birth].Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics 2008;1(1):7-12.
2. Yaşar Ö, Şahin F, Coşar E, Köken G, Cevrioǧlu AS. [Birth method choices of primipar women and the factors which have an effect on these choices]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2007;17 (6):414-20.
3. Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal Birth after cesarean: A 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84(2):255-8.
4. Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: Maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169(4):945-50.
5. McMahon MJ. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41(2):369-81.
6. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996;347(8997):281-4.
7. Tanik A, Üstün C, Cil E, Arslan A. Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24(27):355-7.
8. Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A, Yoshimura S, Miyamura T, Ishimaru T. Predicting incomplete rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(4):596-600. (Pubitemid 30139583)
9. Jastrow N, Antonelli E, Robyr R, Irion O, Boulvain M. Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27(4):420-4.
10. Fukuda M, Shimizu Y, Ihara Y, Fukuda K, Natsuyama E, Mochizuki M. Ultrasound examination of caesarean section scars during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1991;248 (3):129-38.
11. Qureshi B, Inafuku K, Oshima K, Masamoto H, Kanazawa K. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study. Tohoku J Exp Med 1997;183(1):55-65. (Pubitemid 127471157)
12. Suzuki S, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Asakura H, Araki T. Preoperative diagnosis of dehiscence of the lower uterine segment in patients with a single previous caesarean section. Ayt N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;40(4):402-4.
13. Martins WP, Barra DA, Gallarreta FMP, Nastri CO, Filho FM. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two-and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33 (3):301-6.
14. Zimmer EZ, Bardin R, Tamir A, Bronshtein M. Sonographic imaging of cervical scars after cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23(6):594-8.
15. Asakura H, Nakai A, Ishikawa G, Suzuki S, Araki T. Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography. J Nippon Med Sch 2000;67(5):352-6.