메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-155

Selective outcome reporting: Telling and detecting true lies. The state of the science

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 77953330784     PISSN: 18280447     EISSN: 19709366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-010-0371-z     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (17)

References (34)
  • 1
    • 75349083835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nuesch E, AW Rutjes, E Husni, V Welch, P Juni (2009) Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003115.
  • 2
    • 84921537513 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rutjes AW, E Nuesch, R Sterchi, P Juni (2010) Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003132.
  • 3
    • 75349102313 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rutjes AW, E Nuesch, R Sterchi et al. (2009) Transcutaneous electrostimulation for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002823.
  • 4
    • 0016437295 scopus 로고
    • Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis
    • Greenwald AG (1975) Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychol Bull 82: 1-20.
    • (1975) Psychol Bull , vol.82 , pp. 1-20
    • Greenwald, A.G.1
  • 6
    • 84863732058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dickersin K (2005) Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm. In: Rothstein H, Sutton A, Borenstein M (eds) Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment, and adjustments. Wiley, London, pp 11-33.
  • 7
    • 17144387322 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: Review of publications and survey of authors
    • Chan AW, Altman DG (2005) Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ 330: 753.
    • (2005) Bmj , vol.330 , pp. 753
    • Chan, A.W.1    Altman, D.G.2
  • 8
    • 77953335196 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US Government. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. Public Law 110: 85 (September 27, 2007).
  • 9
    • 77953331950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials. gov [online]
    • US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials. gov [online]. http://clinicaltrial. gov/(2009).
  • 10
    • 4544223937 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    • DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 292: 1363-1364.
    • (2004) Jama , vol.292 , pp. 1363-1364
    • Deangelis, C.D.1    Drazen, J.M.2    Frizelle, F.A.3
  • 11
    • 29544449337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005
    • Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC (2005) Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials. gov between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med 353: 2779-2787.
    • (2005) N Engl J Med , vol.353 , pp. 2779-2787
    • Zarin, D.A.1    Tse, T.2    Ide, N.C.3
  • 12
    • 33745462768 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Predictors of publication: Characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals
    • Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2006) Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust 184: 621-626.
    • (2006) Med J Aust , vol.184 , pp. 621-626
    • Lee, K.P.1    Boyd, E.A.2    Holroyd-Leduc, J.M.3    Bacchetti, P.4    Bero, L.A.5
  • 13
    • 19144368541 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
    • Williamson PR, Gamble C (2005) Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 24: 1547-1561.
    • (2005) Stat Med , vol.24 , pp. 1547-1561
    • Williamson, P.R.1    Gamble, C.2
  • 14
    • 0034736550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies
    • Hahn S, Williamson PR, Hutton JL, Garner P, Flynn EV (2000) Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. Stat Med 19: 3325-3336.
    • (2000) Stat Med , vol.19 , pp. 3325-3336
    • Hahn, S.1    Williamson, P.R.2    Hutton, J.L.3    Garner, P.4    Flynn, E.V.5
  • 15
    • 38349049478 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
    • Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 358: 252-260.
    • (2008) N Engl J Med , vol.358 , pp. 252-260
    • Turner, E.H.1    Matthews, A.M.2    Linardatos, E.3    Tell, R.A.4    Rosenthal, R.5
  • 16
    • 84887346660 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Higgins J (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5. 0. 1.
  • 17
    • 75949117541 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical trials: Trial registration cannot alone transform scientific conduct
    • Moja L (2010) Clinical trials: trial registration cannot alone transform scientific conduct. Nat Rev Urol 7: 7-8.
    • (2010) Nat Rev Urol , vol.7 , pp. 7-8
    • Moja, L.1
  • 18
    • 52649129348 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
    • Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA et al (2008) Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 3: e3081.
    • (2008) PLoS One , vol.3
    • Dwan, K.1    Altman, D.G.2    Arnaiz, J.A.3
  • 19
    • 56749166123 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of publication and presentation
    • Rising K, Bacchetti P, Bero L (2008) Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation. PLoS Med 5: e217.
    • (2008) PLoS Med , vol.5
    • Rising, K.1    Bacchetti, P.2    Bero, L.3
  • 20
    • 77953349788 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The impact of outcome reporting bias on systematic reviews
    • Kirkham J, Dwan K, Altman DG et al (2010) The impact of outcome reporting bias on systematic reviews. BMJ 340: c356.
    • (2010) Bmj , vol.340
    • Kirkham, J.1    Dwan, K.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 21
    • 2442692780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles
    • Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291: 2457-2465.
    • (2004) Jama , vol.291 , pp. 2457-2465
    • Chan, A.W.1    Hrobjartsson, A.2    Haahr, M.T.3    Gotzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 22
    • 56749126001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: Comparison of publications with protocols
    • Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG (2008) Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols. BMJ 337: a2299.
    • (2008) Bmj , vol.337
    • Chan, A.W.1    Hrobjartsson, A.2    Jorgensen, K.J.3    Gotzsche, P.C.4    Altman, D.G.5
  • 23
    • 33747167642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: Cross-sectional study
    • Gotzsche PC (2006) Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross-sectional study. BMJ 333: 231-234.
    • (2006) Bmj , vol.333 , pp. 231-234
    • Gotzsche, P.C.1
  • 24
    • 77953332262 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chapin S (1994) A social history of truth: civility and science in the seventeenth-century England. University of Chicago Press.
  • 25
    • 33846563409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why most published research findings are false
    • Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124.
    • (2005) PLoS Med , vol.2
    • Ioannidis, J.P.1
  • 26
    • 69849106854 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: A survey
    • Moja LP, Moschetti I, Nurbhai M et al (2009) Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey. Trials 10: 56.
    • (2009) Trials , vol.10 , pp. 56
    • Moja, L.P.1    Moschetti, I.2    Nurbhai, M.3
  • 27
    • 43249103255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children
    • Sinha I, Jones L, Smyth RL, Williamson PR (2008) A systematic review of studies that aim to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials in children. PLoS Med 5: e96.
    • (2008) PLoS Med , vol.5
    • Sinha, I.1    Jones, L.2    Smyth, R.L.3    Williamson, P.R.4
  • 28
    • 43249126110 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standardising outcomes in paediatric clinical trials
    • Clarke M (2008) Standardising outcomes in paediatric clinical trials. PLoS Med 5: e102.
    • (2008) PLoS Med , vol.5
    • Clarke, M.1
  • 29
    • 57749087849 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations
    • Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J et al (2008) GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. Evid Based Med 13: 162-163.
    • (2008) Evid Based Med , vol.13 , pp. 162-163
    • Schunemann, H.J.1    Oxman, A.D.2    Brozek, J.3
  • 30
    • 0036667853 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: Follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee
    • Hahn S, Williamson PR, Hutton JL (2002) Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee. J Eval Clin Pract 8: 353-359.
    • (2002) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.8 , pp. 353-359
    • Hahn, S.1    Williamson, P.R.2    Hutton, J.L.3
  • 31
    • 4844223081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
    • Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG (2004) Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ 171: 735-740.
    • (2004) Cmaj , vol.171 , pp. 735-740
    • Chan, A.W.1    Krleza-Jeric, K.2    Schmid, I.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 32
    • 42149103746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication and non-publication of clinical trials: Longitudinal study of applications submitted to a research ethics committee
    • Von EE, Rollin A, Blumle A et al (2008) Publication and non-publication of clinical trials: longitudinal study of applications submitted to a research ethics committee. Swiss Med Wkly 138: 197-203.
    • (2008) Swiss Med Wkly , vol.138 , pp. 197-203
    • Von, E.E.1    Rollin, A.2    Blumle, A.3
  • 33
    • 47149089516 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Selective reporting in clinical trials: Analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet
    • Al-Marzouki S, Roberts I, Evans S, Marshall T (2008) Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet. Lancet 372: 201.
    • (2008) Lancet , vol.372 , pp. 201
    • Al-Marzouki, S.1    Roberts, I.2    Evans, S.3    Marshall, T.4
  • 34
    • 69849092717 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials
    • Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P (2009) Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 302: 977-984.
    • (2009) Jama , vol.302 , pp. 977-984
    • Mathieu, S.1    Boutron, I.2    Moher, D.3    Altman, D.G.4    Ravaud, P.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.