Software process improvement through the Lean Measurement (SPI-LEAM) method

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1275-1287

  Petersen, Kai ^a,b   Wohlin, Claes ^a  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b ERICSSON RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Lean software development; Quality improvement paradigm; Software process improvement

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; LARGE SHIFTS; LEADTIME; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PARADIGMS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT QUALITY; SOFTWARE PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77953325355     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson D. Agile Management for Software Engineering: Applying the Theory of Constraints for Business Results (2003), Prentice Hall
2. Basili, V.R., 1985. Quantitative evaluation of software methodology. Tech. Rep. TR-1519, University of Maryland.
3. Basili V.R. The experience factory and its relationship to other quality approaches. Advances in Computers 41 (1995) 65-82
4. Basili V.R., and Green S. Software process evolution at the sel. IEEE Software 11 4 (1994) 58-66
5. Bolch G., Greiner S., Meer H.D., and Trivedi K.S. Queueing Networks and Markov Chains: Modeling and Performance Evaluation with Computer Science Applications. second ed. (2006), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
6. Cassandras C.G., and Lafortune S. Introduction to Discrete Event Systems (1999), Kluwer Academic, Boston
7. Gencel, Ç., Demirörs, O., 2008. Functional size measurement revisited. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 17 (3).
8. CMMI-Product-Team, 2006. Capability maturity model integration for development, version 1.2. Tech. Rep., CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008.
9. Cumbo D., Kline E., and Bumgardner M.S. Benchmarking performance measurement and lean manufacturing in the rough mill. Forest Products Journal 56 6 (2006) 25-30
10. Damm L.-O., Lundberg L., and Wohlin C. Faults-slip-through - a concept for measuring the efficiency of the test process. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 11 1 (2006) 47-59
11. Damm L.-O., Lundberg L., and Wohlin C. A model for software rework reduction through a combination of anomaly metrics. Journal of Systems and Software 81 11 (2008) 1968-1982
12. Donzelli P., and Iazeolla G. Hybrid simulation modelling of the software process. Journal of Systems and Software 59 3 (2001) 227-235
13. Gigch J.P.V. System Design Modeling and Metamodeling (1991), Plenum Press, New York
14. Gorschek T., and Wohlin C. Requirements abstraction model. Requirements Engineering 11 1 (2006) 79-101
15. Gorschek T., Garre P., Larsson S., and Wohlin C. A model for technology transfer in practice. IEEE Software 23 6 (2006) 88-95
16. Höst M., Regnell B., och Dag J.N., Nedstam J., and Nyberg C. Exploring bottlenecks in market-driven requirements management processes with discrete event simulation. Journal of Systems and Software 59 3 (2001) 323-332
17. Jones C. Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality (1997), McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Karlsson C., and Ahlströhm P. The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 4 (2009) 283-295
19. Lindvall M., and Sandahl K. Traceability aspects of impact analysis in object-oriented systems. Journal of Software Maintenance 10 1 (1998) 37-57
20. Lucia A.D., Pompella E., and Stefanucci S. Assessing effort estimation models for corrective maintenance through empirical studies. Information and Software Technology 47 1 (2005) 3-15
21. Maskell B., and Baggaley B. Practical Lean Accounting: A Proven System for Measuring and Managing the Lean Enterprise (2004), Productivity Press
22. Middleton P. Lean software development: two case studies. Software Quality Journal 9 4 (2001) 241-252
23. Middleton, P., Flaxel, A., Cookson, A., 2005. Lean software management case study: Timberline Inc. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP 2005), pp. 1-9.
24. Morgan, T., 1998. Lean manufacturing techniques applied to software development. Master's Thesis, Master Thesis at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
25. Morgan J.M., and Liker J.K. The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process, and Technology (2006), Productivity Press, New York
26. Oppenheim B.W. Lean product development flow. Systems Engineering 7 4 (2004) 352-376
27. Parnell-Klabo, E., 2006. Introducing lean principles with agile practices at a fortune 500 company. In: Proceedings of the AGILE Conference (AGILE 2006), pp. 232-242.
28. Pascale R.T. Managing on the Edge: How the Smartest Companies use Conflict to Stay Ahead (1990), Simon and Schuster, New York
29. Perera, G.I.U.S., Fernando, M., 2007. Enhanced agile software development - hybrid paradigm with lean practice. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS 2007), pp. 239-244.
30. Petersen, K., Wohlin, C., 2010. Measuring the flow of lean software development. Software: Practice and Experience, submitted for publication.
31. Petersen, K., Wohlin, C., Baca, D., 2009. The waterfall model in large-scale development - state of the art vs. industrial case study. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement.
32. Poppendieck, M., Poppendieck, T., 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit (The Agile Software Development Series). Addison-Wesley Professional.
33. Reinertsen D.G. Managing the Design Factory: A Product Developers Toolkit (1997), Free, New York
34. Shingo S. Study of Toyota Production System From the Industrial Engineering Viewpoint (1981), Japanese Management Association
35. Womack J.P., and Jones D.T. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation (2003), Free Press Business, London
36. Zhu, X., Zhou, B., Hou, L., Chen, J., Chen, L., 2008. An experience-based approach for test execution effort estimation. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for Young Computer Scientists (ICYCS 2008), pp. 1193-1198.