Pluripotent patents make prime time: An analysis of the emerging landscape

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 557-559

  Simon, Brenda M ^a   Murdoch, Charles E ^a   Scott, Christopher T ^b  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2;

ANIMAL CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAMMAL CELL; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SHORT SURVEY; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; INTERNATIONALITY; MICE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PATENTS AS TOPIC; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953311789     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0610-557     Document Type: Short Survey

References (21)

1. Takahashi, K. et al. Cell 131, 861-872 (2007).
2. Yu, J. et al. Science 318, 1917-1920 (2007).
3. Park, I. et al. Cell 134, 877-886 (2008).
4. Yamanaka, S. Japan patent JP 2008-131577 (2008).
5. Sakurada, K. et al. UK patent GB2450603 (2010).
6. Jaenisch, R. et al. US patent 7,682,828 (20104).
7. USC § 112.
8. Ariad Pharms. Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. 598 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (en banc).
9. Inre Wands, 858 F.2d 731 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
10. Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
11. USPtO. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §§ 2131.02, 2144.08, edn. 8th (US Patent and trademark Office;(2008).
12. Evans, M.J. & Kaufman, M.H. Nature 292, 154-156 (1981).
13. Vrtovec, K. & Scott, C.t. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 393-395 (2008).
14. USPtO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Foundation of Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. Patent of WARF, Appeal 2010-001854, Patent 7,029,913 (April 28, 2010).
15. Jaenisch, R. et al. United States Patent Application No. 12/703,061 (filed 2010).
16. Jaenisch, R. et al. United States Patent Application No. 12/703,015 (filed 2010)
17. USPtO Requirement for Restriction/Election in US Patent Application No. 10/997,146 (mailed May 24, 2006).
18. Yu, J. & thomson, J.A. Genes Dev. 22, 1987-1997 (2008)
19. In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
20. Zhou, H. et al. Cell Stem Cell 4, 381-384 (2009)
21. Normile, D. Science Insider (February 8, 2010). http://news.sciencemag. org/scienceinsider/2010/02/landmark-plurip.html