Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women's views on alternative packages of care

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 33-37

  Deverill, M ^a   Lancsar, E ^b   Snaith, V B A ^c   Robson, S C ^c  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antenatal care; Discrete choice experiments

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL ATTITUDE; NULLIPARA; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; TELECONSULTATION; UTERINE ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ECHOGRAPHY; ECONOMICS; MIDWIFE; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; TELEPHONE; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOTLINES; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; UTERINE ARTERY;

EID: 77953291281     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Antenatal care: Routine care for healthy pregnant women (2003), National Collaborating Centre For Women's and Children's Health, London
2. Maternity Matters: Choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service (2007), Department of Health/Partnerships for Children, Families and Maternity
3. Villar J, Carroli G, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G, Gülmezoglu M. Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001; 4.
4. Carroli G., Villar J., Piaggio G., et al. WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet 357 9268 (2001) 1565-1570
5. Duckitt K., and Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. Br Med J 330 (2005) 565
6. Ryan M., Ratcliffe J., and Tucker J. Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care. Soc Sci Med 44 (1997) 371-380
7. Viney R., Lancsar E., and Louviere J. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Out Res 2 (2002) 319-326
8. Ryan M., and Gerrad K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 (2003) 55-64
9. Lancsar E., and Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. Pharmacoeconomics 26 8 (2008) 661-677
10. Ryan M., Diack J., Watson V., and Smith N. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for Down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn 25 (2005) 1206-1211
11. Hundley V., Ryan M., and Graham W. Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care. Birth 28 (2001) 254-263
12. Ratcliffe J., and Longworth L. Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18 1 (2002) 139-144
13. McBride C.M., and Rimer B.K. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns 37 (1999) 3-18
14. Creedy D. Telephone support for women during pregnancy and the first month postpartum (Protocol). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reveiws 2003; 2.
15. Papageorghiou A.T., Yu C.K., Cicero S., Bower S., and Nicolaides K.H. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med 12 (2002) 78-88
16. Cnossen JS, Morris K, ter Riet G, Mol BWJ, van der Post JAM, Coomarasamy A, Zwinderman AH, Robson S, Bindels PJE, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Uterine artery Doppler to predict preeclampsia or fetal growth retardation: a systematic review and bivariate analysis Submitted for publication.
17. Lancsar E., and Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistencies between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ 13 9 (2004)
18. Hahn G.J., and Shapiro SS. A Catalog for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments (1966), Canadian Electricity Research and Development Center, Scemelady, NY pp. 66-165
19. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74 (1966) 134-157
20. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in econometrics (1973), Academic Press, New York 105-142
21. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., and Greene W.H. Applied choice analysis: a primer (2005), Cambridge University Press
22. Stata Corporation. Intercooled Stata 8.0 for Windows 98/95/NT (2003), Stata Corporation, College Station, TX
23. Bech M., and Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 14 10 (2005) 1079-1083
24. Singh D., and Newburn M. Access to maternity information and support: The experiences and needs of women before and after giving birth (2000), National Childbirth Trust, London
25. Khan-Neelofur D., Gülmezoglu M., and Villar J. Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 12 Suppl 2 (1998) 7-26
26. Turnbull D., Holmes A., Shields N., et al. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet 348 9022 (1996) 213-218
27. Giles W., Collins J., Ong F., and MacDonald R. Antenatal care of low risk obstetric patients by midwives: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 157 3 (1992) 158-161
28. Shields N., Turnbull D., Reid M., Holmes A., McGinley M., and Smith L. Satisfaction with midwife-managed care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery 14 (1998) 85-93
29. Sikorski J., Wilson J., Clement S., Das S., and Smeeton N. A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project. BMJ 312 7030 (1996) 546-553
30. Clement S., Sikorski J., Wilson J., Das S., and Smeeton N. Women's satisfaction with traditional and reduced antenatal visit schedules. Midwifery 12 (1996) 120-128
31. Clement S., Sikorski J., Wilson J., and Das S. Planning antenatal services to meet women's psychological needs. Br J Midwifery 5 (1997) 298-305
32. Chien P.F., Arnott N., Gordon A., Owen P., and Khan K.S. How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. BJOG 107 (2000) 196-208
33. Toal M., Chan C., Fallah S., et al. Usefulness of a placental profile in high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 4 (2007) 363.e1-7