Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: Exploring the perspectives of childbearing women

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 468-478

  Angle, Pamela ^a,b   Landy, Christine Kurtz ^c   Charles, Cathy ^d   Yee, Jennifer ^b   Watson, Jo ^b   Kung, Rose ^e   Kronberg, Jean ^b   Halpern, Stephen ^b   Lam, Desmond ^f   Lie, Lie Ming ^g   Streiner, David ^b,c  

^a WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f TORONTO EAST GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^g NORTH YORK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; LIDOCAINE; OPIATE; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EMOTION; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR PAIN; MICTURITION DISORDER; MULTIPARA; NEURAXIAL LABOR ANALGESIA; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIMIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; PUERPERIUM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CONTROL; SENSATION;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; LABOR PAIN; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953290734     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-010-9289-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. DJ Birnbach 2004 Advances in labour analgesia Can J Anesth 51 R50 R52 10.1007/BF03018342
2. HK Eltzschig ES Lieberman WR Camann 2003 Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery N Engl J Med 348 319 332 10.1056/NEJMra021276 12540646 (Pubitemid 36119988)
3. DR Gambling P Yu C Cole GH McMoreland L Palmer 1988 A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour Can J Anaesth 35 249 254 10.1007/BF03010618 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3ltlGrtw%3D%3D 3289769
4. M van der Vyver S Halpern G Joseph 2002 Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: A meta-analysis Br J Anaesth 89 459 465 10.1093/bja/aef217 12402726 (Pubitemid 34993977)
5. SH Halpern TW Breen DC Campbell, et al. 2003 A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia Anesthesiology 98 1431 1435 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00020 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXksVamtLc%3D 12766654 (Pubitemid 36622478)
6. DL Hepner RR Gaiser TG Cheek BB Gutsche 2000 Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia Can J Anesth 47 232 236 10.1007/BF03018918 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7pt12ktA%3D%3D 10730733
7. NL Purdie EM Grady 2004 Comparison of patient controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine, both with 0.0002% fentanyl, for analgesia during labour Anaesthesia 59 133 137 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03582.x 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvVKjsb0%3D 14725515 (Pubitemid 38190264)
8. E Boselli R Debon Y Cimino T Rimmele B Allaouchiche D Chassard 2004 Background infusion is not beneficial during labor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil Anesthesiology 100 968 972 10.1097/00000542-200404000-00030 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjs1agsrw%3D 15087635 (Pubitemid 38392587)
9. PN Robinson P Salmon SM Yentis 1998 Maternal satisfaction Int J Obstet Anesth 7 32 37 10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80026-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvhs1OqsA%3D%3D 15321244 (Pubitemid 28045433)
10. nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003: 14-28.
11. M Sandelowski 2000 Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23 334 340 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhsFCmtw%3D%3D 10940958
12. nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 1994.
13. nd ed. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
14. M Sandelowski 1995 Sample size in qualitative research Res Nurs Health 18 179 183 10.1002/nur.4770180211 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3gslCksg%3D%3D 7899572
15. DL Altheide 1987 Ethnographic content analysis Qualitative Sociology 10 65 77 10.1007/BF00988269
16. DL Morgan 1993 Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken Qual Health Res 3 112 121 10.1177/104973239300300107 1:STN:280: DyaK3s3gvVCruw%3D%3D 8457790
17. nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 134.
18. th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
19. nd ed. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 2001.
20. rd ed. UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
21. nd ed. Buckingham, UK, Open University Press; 2001
22. R Melzack 1987 The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire Pain 30 191 197 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FktVSmtQ%3D%3D 3670870 (Pubitemid 18029372)
23. McQuay H, Moore A. Pain measurement, study design and validity. In: McQuay, Moore (Eds). An Evidence-Based Resource for Pain Relief. Oxford, UK, 1998: 15
24. P Angle A Kiss J Yee S Halpern Y Murthy 2006 The new labor pain scale (LPS): description and properties Can J Anesth 53 1 26225 10.1007/BF03016935
25. E Hodnett DA Simmons-Tropea 1987 The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth Res Nurs Health 10 301 310 10.1002/nur.4770100503 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FktF2rsg%3D%3D 3671777
26. RE Collis DW Davies W Aveling 1995 Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour Lancet 345 1413 1416 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92602-X 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3otVKjsg%3D%3D 7760614
27. BM Morgan CJ Bulpitt P Clifton PJ Lewis 1982 Analgesia and satisfaction in childbirth (the Queen Charlotte's 1000 Mother Survey) Lancet 302 808 810 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92691-5
28. ED Hodnett 2002 Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 S160 S172 12011880
29. ED Hodnett RW Osbourne 1989 Effects of continuous intrapartum professional support on childbirth outcomes Res Nurs Health 12 289 297 10.1002/nur.4770120504 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FhvVGhtw%3D%3D 2798949
30. Torvaldsen S, Roberts CL, Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow CH. Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD004457
31. T Saisto E Halmesmaki 2003 Fear of childbirth: A neglected dilemma Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82 201 208 12694113