Erratum: Optimal remifentanil dose for laryngeal mask airway insertion when co-administered with a single standard dose of propofol (Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (2010) 57 (222-229) DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9249-9);Optimal remifentanil dose for laryngeal mask airway insertion when co-administered with a single standard dose of propofol

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 222-229

  Bouvet, Lionel ^a,b   Da Col, Xavier ^b   Rimmelé, Thomas ^a,b   Allaouchiche, Bernard ^a,b   Chassard, Dominique ^b   Boselli, Emmanuel ^a,b  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPRAZOLAM; ATROPINE; EPHEDRINE; HYDROXYZINE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG INFUSION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HEAD MOVEMENT; HEART RATE; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MOUTH; OPTIMAL DRUG DOSE; PREMEDICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESISTANCE TO MOUTH OPENING;

EID: 77953290465     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-010-9326-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (28)

1. Brown GW, Patel N, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 771-2.
2. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 816-8.
3. Tanaka M, Nishikawa T. Propofol requirement for insertion of cuffed oropharyngeal airway versus laryngeal mask airway with and without fentanyl: a dose-finding study. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 14-20.
4. Hui JK, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK, Lam PK. Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 508-12.
5. Yu AL, Critchley LA, Lee A, Gin T. Alfentanil dosage when inserting the classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 684-8.
6. Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, et al. Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 968-75.
7. Lee MP, Kua JS, Chiu WK. The use of remifentanil to facilitate the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 359-62.
8. Grewal K, Samsoon G. Facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion: effects of remifentanil administered before induction with target-controlled propofol infusion. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 897-901.
9. Kim MK, Lee JW, Jang DJ, Shin OY, Nam SB. Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 136-40.
10. Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 144-52.
11. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429-34.
12. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 429-37.
13. Bouvet L, Stoian A, Rimmele T, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D, Boselli E. Optimal remifentanil dosage for providing excellent intubating conditions when co-administered with a single standard dose of propofol. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 719-26.
14. Brain AI, McGhee TD, McAteer EJ, Thomas A, Abu-Saad MA, Bushman JA. The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 356-61.
15. Nam JM. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for detecting linear trend in proportions. Biometrics 1987; 43: 701-5.
16. Shafer A, Sung ML, White PF. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil infusions during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 1021-8.
17. Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: S7-14.
18. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Gregg KM, Henthorn TK, Shafer SL. Using the time of maximum effect site concentration to combine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 324-33.
19. Billard V, Moulla F, Bourgain JL, Megnigbeto A, Stanski DR. Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1384-93.
20. Hickey S, Cameron AE, Asbury AJ. Cardiovascular response to insertion of Brain's laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 629-33.
21. Scheller MS, Zornow MH, Saidman LJ. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 788-93.
22. Thompson JP, Rowbotham DJ. Remifentanil-an opioid for the 21st century. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 341-3.
23. Stevens JB, Wheatley L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 45-9.
24. Durmus M, Ender G, Kadir BA, Nurcin G, Erdogan O, Ersoy MO. Remifentanil with thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1336-9.
25. Sanford TJ Jr, Weinger MB, Smith NT, et al. Pretreatment with sedative-hypnotics, but not with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants, attenuates alfentanil-induced muscle rigidity. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 473-80.
26. Erhan E, Ugur G, Alper I, Gunusen I, Ozyar B. Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 37-43.
27. Ciccone GK, Holdcroft A. Drugs and sex differences: a review of drugs relating to anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 255-65.
28. Olofsen E, Romberg R, Bijl H, et al. Alfentanil and placebo analgesia: no sex differences detected in models of experimental pain. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 130-9.