Analytic hierarchy process based on variable weights

Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 723-731

  Li, Chun Hao ^a   Sun, Yong He ^a,b   Jia, Yan Hui ^a   Du, Yuan Wei ^a,b  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Alternative ranking; Analysis structure; Analytic hierarchy process; Decision making; Value system; Variable weight

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE RANKING; ANALYSIS STRUCTURE; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; COMPOSITE RANKING; NEW APPROACHES; NON-LINEARITY; REAL EXAMPLE; VALUE SYSTEMS; VARIABLE WEIGHT;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953280651     PISSN: 10006788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process[M]. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2001.
2. Badiru A B, Pulat P S, Kang M. DDM: decision support system for hierarchical dynamic decision making[J]. Decision Support System, 1993, 10(1): 1-18.
3. Wang Y M, Elhag T M S. An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP[J]. Decision Support System, 2006, 42(3): 1474-1480.
4. Wang Y M, Luo Y. On rank reversal in decision analysis[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2009, 49(5-6): 1221-1259.
5. Leung L C, Cao D. On the efficacy of modeling multiattribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132(1): 39-49.
6. Ramanathan R. Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, 33(5): 1289-1307.
7. Stam A, Duarte Silva A P. On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(1): 92-108.
8. Wang P Z. Fuzzy Sets and Stochastic Sets Projection[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 1985.
9. Li H X. Factor spaces and mathematical frame of knowledge representation (VIII)[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 1995, 9(3): 1-9.
10. Liu W Q. The ordinary variable weight principle and multiobjective decision-making[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2000, 20(3): 1-11.
11. Li D Q, Li H X. The properties and construction of state variable weight vectors[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Natural Science, 2002, 38(4): 455-461.
12. Li D Q, Cui H M, Li H X. Multifactor decision making based on hierarchical variable weights[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2004, 19(3): 258-263.
13. Li D Q, Li H X. Analysis of variable weights effect and selection of appropriate state variable weights vector in decision making[J]. Control and Decision, 2004, 19(11): 1241-1245.
14. Zhang R, Wang P, Ding L. Some issues on variable weight synthesis[J]. Microcomputer Information, 2006, 22(7-1): 261-263.
15. Scholl A, Manthey L, Helm R, et al. Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 164(3): 760-777.
16. Moskowitz H R, Silcher M. The applications of conjoint analysis and their possible uses in sensometrics[J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2006, 17(3-4): 145-165.
17. Ida T, Kinoshita S, Sato M. Conjoint analysis of demand for IP telephony: The case of Japan[J]. Applied Economics, 2008, 40(10): 1279-1287.
18. Winterfeldt D V, Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
19. Loewena P D, Wang X F. On the multiplicity of Dini subgradients in separable spaces[J]. Nonlinear Analysis, 2004, 58(1-2): 1-10.