Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: Registry data and review of multicentre trials

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 368-384

  Maffei, E ^a   Palumbo, A ^a,b   Martini, C ^a,b   Meijboom, W ^b   Tedeschi, C ^c   Spagnolo, P ^d   Zuccarelli, A ^e   Weustink, A ^b   Torri, T ^e   Mollet, N ^b   Seitun, S ^a   Krestin, G P ^b   Cademartiri, F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c San Gennaro Hospital   (Italy)

^d SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^e Azienda ASL   (Italy)

Author keywords

64 Slice CT; Conventional coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Large population; Multicentre trials; Multislice computed tomography; Registry

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; REGISTER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGISTRIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77953274027     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-009-0492-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensig BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599-603
2. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography Circulation 106:2051-2054
3. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265-2270
4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128-132 (Pubitemid 40052038)
5. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) Highresolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318-2323
6. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Belgrano M et al (2005) Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography. Radiol Med (Torino) 110:16-41 (Pubitemid 41415967)
7. Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al (2003) Spiral CT-angiography with one, four, and sixteen slice scanners. Technical note. Radiol Med (Torino) 106:269-283
8. Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al (2003) Non-invasive angiography of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography: state of the art and future prospects. Radiol Med (Torino) 106:284-296
9. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically- gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535-2538
10. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al (2008) Dual-source CT in step-andshoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 249:71-80
11. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al (2008) Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 94:1132-1137
12. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248:431-437
13. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C et al (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424-430
14. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al (2006) Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:1341-1381 (Pubitemid 43998110)
15. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2008) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NAS CI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475-1497
16. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al (2008) Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:531-556
17. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M et al (2008) Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 118:586-606
18. Marano R, De Cobelli F, Floriani I et al (2009) Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16-and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease). Eur Radiol 19:1114-1123
19. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-1732
20. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL et al (2009) Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol 19:816-828
21. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135-2144
22. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2007) Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 28:3034-3041
23. Andreini D, Pontone G, Pepi M et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2044-2050
24. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 233:817-823
25. Cademartiri F, van der Lugt A, Luccichenti G et al (2002) Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:598-607
26. Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al (2004) Use of saline chaser in the intravenous administration of contrast material in non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-row multislice computed tomography. Radiol Med (Torino) 107:497-505 (Pubitemid 38937528)
27. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5-40
28. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al (2001) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenosis. N Engl J Med 345:1863-1869 (Pubitemid 33716560)
29. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA et al (2005) Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary stenosis with multislice computed tomography angiography. Am J Cardiol 95:1225-1227 (Pubitemid 40616426)
30. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Mollet NR et al (2005) Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 110:42-51 (Pubitemid 41415968)
31. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482-1487
32. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al (2006) Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 97:343-348
33. Pugliese F, Hunink M G M, Gruszczynska K et al (2009) Learning Curve for Coronary CT Angiography: What Constitutes Sufficient Training? (2009) Radiology (in press)