The future of mammography: Radiology residents' experiences, attitudes, and opinions

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 194, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1680-1686

  Baxi, Shrujal S ^a   Snow, Jacqueline G ^a   Liberman, Laura ^a   Elkin, Elena B ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Breast imaging; Education; Mammography; Screening mammography; Workforce

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MALPRACTICE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; WORK SCHEDULE; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST DISEASE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; BREAST DISEASES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 77953253312     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3735     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69: 349-355 (Pubitemid 12018584)
2. Tabár L, Fragerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1:829-832
3. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice: mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1672-1680
4. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2005; 293:1245-1256
5. [No authors listed]. Summaries for patients: screening for breast cancer - recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137(5 Part 1):I47
6. Meyer J. Age: Census 2000 brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001:C2KBR/01-12
7. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003; 97:1528-1540
8. Breen N, Cronin AK, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer 2007; 109:2405-2409 (Pubitemid 46906458)
9. Farria DM, Schmidt ME, Monsees BS, et al. Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey. Cancer 2005; 104: 491-498
10. Joy JE, Penhoet EE, Petitti DB, eds.; Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer; Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies. Strategies for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000
11. Bassett LW, Monsees BS, Smith RA, et al. Survey of radiology residents: breast imaging training and attitudes. Radiology 2003; 227:862-869
12. Hardy SM, Kornguth PJ, Baum JK. Massachusetts radiology resident attitudes toward mammography. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2:432-435
13. Baxi SS, Liberman L, Lee C, Elkin EB. Breast imaging fellowships in the United States: who, what, and where? AJR 2009; 192:403-407
14. Mainiero MB. Mentoring radiology residents: why, who, when, and how. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:547-550
15. Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine. Beyond bias and barriers: fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. 2006, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007
16. Sunshine JH, Maynard CD. Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2006-2007. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 686-690
17. Sunshine JH, Maynard CD. Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2007-2008. J Am Coll Radiol 2008; 5: 827-833
18. D'Orsi C, Tu SP, Nakano C, et al. Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist? Radiology 2005; 235:391-395 (Pubitemid 40571073)
19. Physician Insurers Association of America. Physician Insurers Association of America (PIAA) study: 2002 study. Rockville, MD: Physician Insurers Association of America, Spring 2002
20. Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, et al. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. Radiology 2005; 236:37-46
21. Cypel YS, Sunshine JH, Ellenbogen PH. The current medical liability insurance crisis: detailed findings from two ACR surveys in 2003 and 2004. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2:595-601
22. Enzmann DR, Anglada PM, Haviley C, Venta LA. Providing professional mammography services: financial analysis. Radiology 2001; 219: 467-473 (Pubitemid 32336363)
23. Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Women radiologists in the United States: results from the American College of Radiology's 2003 survey. Radiology 2007; 242:802-810
24. Fielding JR, Major MN, Mullan BF, et al. Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. AJR 2007; 188:897-900
25. Shetty SK, Venkatesan AM, Foster KM, Galdino GM, Lawrimore TM, Davila JA. The radiology class of 2005: postresidency plans. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2:852-858
26. Bassett LW, Lubisich JP, Bresch JP, Jessop NW, Hendrick RE. Quality assurance in mammography: status of residency education. AJR 1993; 160:271-274 (Pubitemid 23059210)
27. Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, Bhargavan M. A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States. AJR 2006; 187:1167; [web]:W456-W468
28. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:369-375 (Pubitemid 34257480)
29. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Rosenberg R, et al.; the National Institutes of Health Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Physician workload in mammography. AJR 2008; 190:526-532