A probabilistic approach to information control

Journal of Internet Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 407-416

  Nyre, Åsmund Ahlmann ^a   Jaatun, Martin Gilje ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

Author keywords

Information control; Policy enforcement; Security; Trust based systems

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; APPLICATION AREA; CLOUD COMPUTING; CRITICAL INFORMATION; INFORMATION AGGREGATION; INFORMATION CONTROL; INVESTMENT COSTS; MIDDLEWARE ARCHITECTURE; NATIONAL SECURITY; PRIVACY PROTECTION; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; SECURITY MECHANISM; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; TRUST MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; TRUST-BASED SYSTEMS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MIDDLEWARE; SEMANTIC WEB;

AGGLOMERATION;

EID: 77953250064     PISSN: 16079264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. T. Berners-Lee et al., The Semantic Web, Scientific America, May, 2001, pp.34-43.
2. P. Mika and G. Tummarello, Web Semantics in the Clouds, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol.23, 2008, pp.82-87.
3. Å. A. Nyre and M. G. Jaatun, Privacy in a Semantic Cloud: What's Trust Got to Do with it?, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Cloud Computing (CloudCom), Bejing, China, 2009, pp.107-118.
4. H. Burkert, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: Typology, Critique, Vision, Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, P. Agre and M. Rotenberg, Eds., Ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1997, pp.125-142.
5. L. Cranor et al., The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification, Ed: W3C Recommendation, 2002.
6. I. Goldberg et al., Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for the Internet, The Proc. of 42nd IEEE Spring COMPCON, 1997.
7. EPIC, Pretty Poor Privacy: An Assessment of P3P and Internet Privacy, Electronic Privacy Information Center, June, 2000.
8. P. Bonatti and D. Olmedilla, Driving and Monitoring Provisional Trust Negotiation with Metapolicies, The Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2005. 6th IEEE International Workshop on, 2005.
9. N. Damianou et al., The Ponder Policy Specification Language, Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, Ed Berlin: Springer Verlag, Vol.1995, 2001, pp.18-38.
10. L. Kagal et al., A Policy Based Approach to Security for the Semantic Web, Semantic Web - ISWC 2003, Ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin, Vol.2870, 2003, pp.402-418.
11. C. Duma et al., Privacy in the Semantic Web: What Policy Languages Have to Offer, the Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2007. POLICY 2007, 8th IEEE International Workshop on, 2007.
12. EU, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data, Ed: Official Journal of the European Communities, 1995.
13. EU, Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Processing of Personal Data and the Protection of Privacy in the Electronic Communications Sector, Ed: Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002.
14. G. V. Lioudakis et al., A Middleware Architecture for Privacy Protection, Computer Networks, Vol.51, November, 2007, pp.4679-4696.
15. J. Park and R. Sandhu, The UCON-ABC Usage Control Model, ACM Transactions on Information Systems Secuity, Vol.7, 2004, pp.128-174.
16. R. Sandhu et al., Client-Side Access Control Enforcement Using Trusted Computing and PEI Models, Journal of High Speed Networks, Vol.15, 2006, pp.229-245.
17. R. Housley et al., RFC 3280: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile: RFC Editor, 2002.
18. V. Varadharajan, A Note on Trust-Enhanced Security, Security & Privacy, IEEE, Vol.7, 2009, pp.57-59.
19. D. Artz and Y. Gil, A Survey of Trust in Computer Science and the Semantic Web, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Vol.5, June, 2007, pp.58-71.
20. G. Bigley and J. Pearce, Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, 1998, pp.405-421.
21. R. Mayer et al., An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, Vol.2, 1995, pp.709-734.
22. S. P. Marsh, Formalizing Trust as a Computational Concept, Department of Computing Science and Mathematics, University of Sterling, 1994.
23. M. Conrad et al., A Lightweight Model of Trust Propagation in a Multi-Client Network Environment: to What Extent Does Experience Matter? The Availability, Reliability and Security, 2006, ARES 2006. The First International Conference on, 2006.
24. Y. Gil and D. Artz, Towards Content Trust of Web Resources, the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
25. J. Golbeck and J. Hendler, Accuracy of Metrics for Inferring Trust and Reputation in Semantic Web-based Social Networks, the 14th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Northamptonshire, UK, 2004.
26. R. Guha et al., Propagation of Trust and Distrust, the WWW 2004: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
27. J. Huang and M. S. Fox, An Ontology of Trust: Formal Semantics and Transitivity, Ed: ACM, 2006.
28. J. Lopez et al., Why Have Public Key Infrastructures Failed So Far?, Internet Research, Vol.15, 2005, pp.544-556.
29. A. Nadalin et al., Web Services Security Policy Language (WS-SecurityPolicy), OASIS 2007.
30. L. Kagal et al., Authorization and Privacy for Semantic Web Services, Intelligent Systems, Vol.19, 2004, pp.50-56.