Assessment of visual landscape perception of Urban Parks;Kent Parklarında Görsel Peyzaj Algısının Deǧerlendirilmesi

Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 88-95

  Çakci, Işil ^a   Çelem, Hayran ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Landscape perception; Landscape preferences; Urban parks; Visual landscape assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953246765     PISSN: 13007580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1501/tarimbil_0000001077     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anonymous. 2000. European Landscape Convention. Council of Europe. ETS no.176. Florence, Italy.
2. Appleton, J. 1980. Landscape in the arts and the sciences.University of Hull, Yorkshire.
3. Bell, S. 1999. Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. E & FN Spon. London.
4. Berleant, A. 1992. The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press. Philadelphia.
5. Berlyne, D. E. 1960. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Berlyne, D. E. 1971. Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
7. Berlyne, D. E. 1972. Ends and means of experimental aesthetics. Canadian Journal of Psychology 26: 303-325.
8. Daniel, T. C. and J. Vining. 1983. Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. s: 39-84. Ed.: I. Altman, J. F. Wohlwill. Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research Vol 6. Plenum Press, New York.
9. Galindo, M. P. and J. A. C. Rodriguez. 2000. Environmental aesthetics and psychological wellbeing: Relationships between preference judgements for urban landscapes and other relevant affective responses. Psychology in Spain 4(1): 13-27.
10. http://www.webshots.com (2006).
11. http://www.ntscmp.com (2006).
12. Kaplan, S. 1978. On knowing the environment. Ed.: S. Kaplan, R. Kaplan. Humanscape: Environments for people. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
13. Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R. 1983. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Ulrich's Bookstore.
14. Kaplan, R., S. Kaplan and R. L. Ryan 1998. With People in Mind. Island Press, USA.
15. Nasar, J.L. 1992. Visual preferences in urban street scenes: a cross cultural comparison between Japan and the United States. Ed.: J. Nasar. Environmental aesthetics: theory, research and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
16. Palmer, J.F. 2003. Research agenda for landscape perception. pp: 163-172 Ed.: E. Buhmann, S. Ervin. Trends in Landscape Modeling. Heidelberg, Germany.
17. Parsons, R. and Daniel, T.C. 2002. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 43-56.
18. Porteous, J.D. 1996. Environmental Aesthetics: ideas, politics and planning. Routledge, London.
19. Schroeder, H.W. 1982. Preferred features of urban parks and forests. Journal of Arboriculture 8 (12): 317-322.
20. Ungar, S. 1999. Environmental perception, cognition and appraisal. Glasgow Caledonian University, Environmental Psychology 4 lecture notes. Scotland.
21. Wohlwill, J. F. 1983. The concept of nature: a psychologist's view. s: 5-37. Ed.: I. Altman, J. F. Wohlwill. Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research Vol 6. Plenum Press, New York.