Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up

Spine Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 404-409

  Kim, Jin Sung ^a   Choi, Won Gyu ^a   Lee, Sang Ho ^a  

^a Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

5 Year follow up; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Isthmic spondylolisthesis; Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; LEG PAIN; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WORK RESUMPTION;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953236511     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fairbank J. Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Spine 20 (1995) 1535-1537
2. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53 (1971) 891-903
3. Lee S.H., Choi W.G., Lim S.R., et al. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J 4 (2004) 644-649
4. Chastain C.A., Eck J.C., Hodges S.D., et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of long-term pain relief and fusion outcomes. Orthopedics 30 (2007) 389-392
5. Dou Y., Hao D., Wen S., and He B. Comparison of clinical outcomes between two methods of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 20 (2006) 743-746
6. Gödde S., Fritsch E., Dienst M., and Kohn D. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 28 (2003) 1693-1699
7. Kwon B.K., Berta S., Daffner S.D., et al. Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 469-476
8. Lauber S., Schulte T.L., Liljenqvist U., et al. Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine 31 (2006) 1693-1698
9. Madan S., and Boeree N.R. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 27 (2002) 1536-1542
10. Humphreys S.C., Hodges S.D., Patwardhan A.G., et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26 (2001) 567-571
11. Whitecloud T.S., Roesch W.W., and Ricciardi J.E. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14 (2001) 100-103
12. Ishihara H., Osada R., Kanamori M., et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14 (2001) 91-99
13. Kwon B.K., Hilibrand A.S., Malloy K., et al. A critical analysis of the literature regarding surgical approach and outcome for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 (2005) S30-S40
14. Swan J., Hurwitz E., Malek F., et al. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion. Spine J 6 (2006) 606-614
15. Videbaek T.S., Christensen F.B., Soegaard R., et al. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31 (2006) 2875-2880
16. Kim D.Y., Lee S.H., Chung S.K., and Lee H.Y. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 30 (2005) 123-129
17. Kim N.H., and Lee J.W. Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results. Spine 24 (1999) 812-816
18. Zhao J., Hou T., Wang X., and Ma S. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation. Eur Spine J 12 (2003) 173-177
19. Min J.H., Jang J.S., and Lee S.H. Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7 (2007) 21-26
20. Akamaru T., Kawahara N., Tim Yoon S., et al. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28 (2003) 1560-1566
21. Umehara S., Zindrick M.R., Patwardhan A.G., et al. The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25 (2000) 1617-1624
22. Goldstein J.A., Macenski M.J., Griffith S.L., and McAfee P.C. Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage. Spine 26 (2001) 1137-1142
23. Lai P.L., Chen L.H., Niu C.C., et al. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine 29 (2004) 2527-2532