Towards a noninvasive anatomical and functional diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Netherlands Heart Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 270-273

  Groothuis, J G J ^a   Beek, A M ^b   Meijerink, M R ^a   Brinckman, S L ^b   Hofman, M B M ^b   van Rossum, A C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease magnetic resonance imaging tomography; X ray computed coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953236426     PISSN: 15685888     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03091775     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, Lehmann K, Dubach P, Colombo A, et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation. 1989;80:87-98.
2. Kim C, Kwok YS, Heagerty P, Redberg R. Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: A meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2001;142:934-944.
3. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1161-1170.
4. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:3042-3050.
5. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, van der Wall EE, Jukema JW,et al. Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for ruling out suspected coronary artery disease: what is the prevalence of a normal study in a general clinical population? Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2006-2013.
6. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pecto-ris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1341-1381.
7. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/ SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475-1497.
8. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angio-graphy versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636-643.
9. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angio-graphy with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508-2514.
10. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, Manning WJ, Pohost GM, Rademakers FE, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6:727-765.
11. Beek AM, Kuhl HP, Bondarenko O, Twisk JW, Hofman MB, van Dockum WG, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:895-901.
12. Marcu CB, Nijveldt R, Beek AM, van Rossum AC. Delayed contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of cardiac disease. Heart Lung Circ. 2007;16:70-78.
13. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knu-sel PR, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and quantitative angiography. Circulation. 2001:103:2230-2245.
14. Kuhl HP, Katoh M, Buhr C, Krombach GA, Hoffmann R, Rassaf T, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1090-1115.
15. Kurita T, Sakuma H, Onishi K, Ishida M, Kitagawa K, Yama-naka T, et al. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:444-452.
16. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:480-499.
17. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S, Manka R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation. 2007;115:1769-1776.
18. Pilz G, Jeske A, Klos M, Ali E, Hoefling B, Scheck R, et al. Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1408-1412.
19. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Douglas JS, Fihn SD, et al. ACC/ AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:2092-2197.
20. Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, Meijerink MR, Koestner SC, Nijveldt R, et al. Low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease: comparison of coronary CT angiography with first-pass MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2010;254:384-392.