Some thoughts on the interpretation of steady-state evoked potentials

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 205-214

  Heinrich, Sven P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Electroretinogram; Frequency domain techniques; Response detection; Steady state evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77953231135     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9212-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AM Norcia T Sato P Shinn J Mertus 1986 Methods for the identification of evoked response components in the frequency and combined time/frequency domains Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 65 212 226 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90056-0 1:STN:280:DyaL287msVSqtw%3D%3D 2420574
2. JD Victor J Mast 1990 A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 78 378 388 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90099-P
3. RA Dobie MJ Wilson 1993 Objective response detection in the frequency domain Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88 516 524 10.1016/0168-5597(93) 90040-V 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fmt1GrtQ%3D%3D 7694837 (Pubitemid 23342008)
4. AP Liavas GV Moustakides G Henning EZ Psarakis P Husar 1998 A periodogram-based method for the detection of steady-state visually evoked potentials IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45 242 248 10.1109/10.661272 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jsVWitA%3D%3D 9473847 (Pubitemid 28128243)
5. T Meigen M Bach 1999 On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses Doc Ophthalmol 98 207 232 10.1023/A:1002097208337 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhtF2jtA%3D%3D 10945442 (Pubitemid 30458369)
6. MM Müller P Malinowski T Gruber SA Hillyard 2003 Sustained division of the attentional spotlight Nature 424 309 312 10.1038/nature01812 12867981 (Pubitemid 36899371)
7. M Bach T Meigen 1999 Do's and don'ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials Doc Ophthalmol 99 69 82 10.1023/A:1002648202420 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvhtF2iug%3D%3D 10947010 (Pubitemid 30495271)
8. H Strasburger W Scheidler I Rentschler 1988 Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential Appl Optics 27 1069 1088 10.1364/AO.27.001069
9. M Bach JP Maurer ME Wolf 2008 VEP-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients Brit J Ophthalmol 92 396 403 10.1136/bjo.2007.130245 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7ktlOnsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351363539)
10. SP Heinrich M Bach 2001 Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials Doc Ophthalmol 102 141 156 10.1023/A:1017509717071 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvnsV2jsw%3D%3D 11518457 (Pubitemid 32725082)
11. H Strasburger 1987 The analysis of steady state evoked potentials revisited Clin Vision Sci 1 245 256
12. AM Norcia CW Tyler RD Hamer W Wesemann 1989 Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP Vision Res 29 627 637 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90048-5 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7gtFChsg%3D%3D 2603399 (Pubitemid 19091679)
13. B Lütkenhöner 1991 Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 491 52 60 10.3109/00016489109136781
14. DM Simpson 2000 Objective response detection in an electroencephalogram during somatosensory stimulation Ann Biomed Eng 28 691 698 10.1114/1.1305530 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fos1emsA%3D%3D 10983714
15. SP Heinrich 2009 Permutation-based significance tests for multi-harmonic steady-state evoked potentials IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56 534 537 10.1109/TBME.2008.2006021 19272910
16. LB Felix AMFL Mirandade Sa AFC Infantosi HC Yehia 2007 Multivariate objective response detectors (MORD): statistical tools for multichannel EEG analysis during rhythmic stimulation Ann Biomed Eng 35 443 452 10.1007/s10439-006-9231-4 17180463 (Pubitemid 46325731)
17. J Mast JD Victor 1991 Fluctuations of steady-state veps: interaction of driven evoked potentials and the eeg Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78 389 401 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90100-I 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3nsFOmtw%3D%3D 1711457
18. RE Delgado O Ozdamar 2004 Deconvolution of evoked responses obtained at high stimulus rates J Acoust Soc Am 115 1242 1251 10.1121/1.1639327 15058345 (Pubitemid 38298574)
19. DL Jewett G Caplovitz B Baird M Trumpis MP Olson LJ Larson-Prior 2004 The use of QSD (q-sequence deconvolution) to recover superposed, transient evoked-responses Clin Neurophysiol 115 2754 2775 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.014 15546784 (Pubitemid 39534361)
20. J Bohórquez Ö Özdamar N AçIkgöz E Yavuz 2007 Methodology to estimate the transient evoked responses for the generation of steady state responses Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 2444 2447 18002488
21. D Mell M Bach SP Heinrich 2008 Fast stimulus sequences improve the efficiency of event-related potential P300 recordings J Neurosci Meth 174 259 264 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.07.007
22. EE Sutter D Tran 1992 The field topography of ERG components in man-I The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32 433 446 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90235-B 1:STN:280:DyaK383psFGqtw%3D%3D
23. Smith SW (1999) The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing. 2nd edn., California Technical Publishing, San Diego, CA
24. MF Marmor AB Fulton GE Holder Y Miyake M Brigell M Bach 2009 ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update) Doc Ophthalmol 118 69 77 10.1007/s10633-008-9155-4 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2FnvVGjsQ%3D%3D 19030905