3D-MAM: 3D morphable appearance model for efficient fine head pose estimation from still images

2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 192-199

  Storer, Markus ^a   Urschler, Martin ^a   Bischof, Horst ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2D SYNTHESIS; 3D HEAD; 3D MORPHABLE MODEL; APPEARANCE MODELS; EXPRESSIBILITY; FACIAL APPEARANCE; FACIAL MODEL; FITTING ALGORITHMS; HEAD POSE; HEAD POSE ESTIMATION; HIGH VARIABILITY; IMAGE SEQUENCE; INPUT IMAGE; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; STILL IMAGES;

COMPUTER VISION; ESTIMATION; FACE RECOGNITION; GESTURE RECOGNITION; MOTION ESTIMATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TRACKING (POSITION);

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77953218930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457701     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. B. Amberg, S. Romdhani, and T. Vetter. Optimal step nonrigid ICP algorithms for surface registration. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1-8, June 2007.
2. V. Balasubramanian, Y. Jieping, and S. Panchanathan. Biased manifold embedding: A framework for person-independent head pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1-7, June 2007.
3. R. Beichel, H. Bischof, F. Leberl, and M. Sonka. Robust active appearance models and their application to medical image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24(9):1151-1169, Sept. 2005.
4. J. Black, M. Gargesha, K. Kahol, P. Kuchi, and S. Panchanathan. A framework for performance evaluation of face recognition algorithms. In Internet Multimedia Systems II, July 2002.
5. V. Blanz, P. Grother, P. J. Phillips, and T. Vetter. Face recognition based on frontal views generated from non-frontal images. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 454-461, June 2005.
6. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, pages 187-194, 1999.
7. V Blanz and T. Vetter. Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Trans, on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(9): 1063-1074, September 2003.
8. C.-W. Chen and C.-C. Wang. 3D active appearance model for aligning faces in 2D images. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3133-3139, September 2008.
9. T. Cootes, K. Walker, and C. Taylor. View-based active appearance models. In Proc. 4th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 227-232, 2000.
10. T. F. Cootes, G. J. Edwards, and C. J. Taylor. Active appearance models. IEEE Trans, on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(6):681-685, 2001.
11. M. D. Cordea and E. M. Petriu. A 3-D anthropometric-muscle-based active appearance model. IEEE Trans, on Instrumentation and Measurement, 55(1):91-98, February 2006.
12. M. D. Cordea, E. M. Petriu, and D. C. Petriu. Three-dimensional head tracking and facial expression recovery using an anthropometric muscle-based active appearance model. IEEE Trans, on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57(8):1578-1588, August 2008.
13. R. Donner, M. Reiter, G. Langs, P. Peloschek, and H. Bischof. Fast active appearance model search using canonical correlation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(10):1690-1694, 2006. (Pubitemid 46405085)
14. M. Garland and P. S. Heckbert. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proc. 24th Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pages 209-216, 1997.
15. S. R. H. Langton, H. Honeyman, and E. Tessler. The influence of head contour and nose angle on the perception of eyegaze direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(5):752-771, 2004.
16. G. Little, S. Krishna, J. Black, and S. Panchanathan. A methodology for evaluating robustness of face recognition algorithms with respect to changes in pose and illumination angle. In ICASSP 2005, March 2005.
17. S. C. Mitchell, J. G. Bosch, B. P. F Lelieveldt, R. J. van der Geest, J. H. C. Reiber, and M. Sonka. 3-D active appearance models: Segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 21(9):1167-1178, September 2002.
18. E. Murphy-Chutorian and M. M. Trivedi. HyHOPE: hybrid head orientation and position estimation for vision-based driver head tracking. In Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pages 512-517, June 2008.
19. E. Murphy-Chutorian and M. M. Trivedi. Head pose estimation in computer vision: A survey. IEEE Trans, on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(4):607-626, April 2009.
20. S. Romdhani and T. Vetter. Efficient, robust and accurate fitting of a 3D morphable model. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 1, pages 59-66, October 2003.
21. M. B. Stegmann and D. Pedersen. Bi-temporal 3D active appearance models with applications to unsupervised ejection fraction estimation. In Proc. International Symposium on Medical Imaging, volume 5747, pages 336-350, 2005.
22. USF DARPA Human-ID 3D Face Database. Courtesy of Prof. Sudeep Sarkar, University of South Florida.
23. J. Xiao, S. Baker, I. Matthews, and T. Kanade. Real-time combined 2D+3D active appearance models. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 535-542, June 2004.